Weblogic ServerApplication · Bea

CVE-2005-1749

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-05-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in BEA WebLogic Server and WebLogic Express 6.1 Service Pack 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption from thread looping).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in BEA WebLogic Server and WebLogic Express 6.1 Service Pack 4 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via CPU consumption from thread looping. The overflow triggers infinite looping in server threads, exhausting CPU resources.

MitigationApply available patches for WebLogic 6.1 or migrate to a supported WebLogic version, as version 6.1 is end-of-life. Implement network-level filtering to restrict unauthorized access to the WebLogic administration ports.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Weblogic ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0= 6.1= 7.0= 7.0.0.1= 8.1
Weblogic PortalApplication
Affected:= 8.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WebLogic Server version
    Check the installed WebLogic version by examining the registry (on Windows) or the installation directory for version files. Common locations: BEA_HOME/weblogic/version.txt or check the product version through the WebLogic administration console under 'Server' > 'General' tab.
    Affected if The installed version matches 6.0, 6.1, 7.0, 7.0.0.1, or 8.1 for WebLogic Server; or version 8.0 for Oracle Weblogic Portal.
  2. Confirm WebLogic administration port exposure
    Identify which ports the WebLogic administration service is listening on. Check configuration files (config.xml) in the domain directory, or run 'netstat -an' or 'ss -tlnp' to identify open ports associated with the WebLogic process.
    Affected if The administration port (typically 7001 for default installations) is accessible from untrusted networks.
  3. Verify if HTTP cluster or servlet container is enabled
    Examine the config.xml file in the WebLogic domain directory for <Server> or <Application> elements that enable HTTP-related services. Check if the WebLogic servlet container is running.
    Affected if HTTP servlet container or cluster services are active and processing requests on the affected version.
  4. Monitor for thread exhaustion symptoms
    Use operating system tools (top, htop, Windows Task Manager) to observe WebLogic process CPU usage. Use WebLogic administration console or JMX to check thread pool statistics - look for threads in 'STUCK' or infinite loop states.
    Affected if CPU consumption spikes to near-100% with thread count remaining high and no progress in request processing.

You are affected if running WebLogic Server 6.0, 6.1, 7.0, 7.0.0.1, or 8.1 (or Weblogic Portal 8.0) with the administration/HTTP interface exposed and experiencing unexplained thread exhaustion.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available patches for WebLogic 6.1 or migrate to a supported WebLogic version, as version 6.1 is end-of-life. Implement network-level filtering to restrict unauthorized access to the WebLogic administration ports.

Fix this in Weblogic Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,760
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-1749 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-1749 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data