CVE-2005-2495
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple integer overflows in XFree86 before 4.3.0 allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted pixmap image.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger overflow vulnerabilities in XFree86's pixmap image handling allow arbitrary code execution via crafted images. The overflows occur when processing pixmap dimensions or data, enabling attackers to corrupt memory through user-assisted attacks (e.g., loading a malicious image).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.3.6= 4.0.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.1.0= 4.2.0= 4.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify XFree86 installation and versionRun 'XFree86 -version' or check package manager output (rpm -q XFree86, dpkg -l | grep XFree86, or yum list installed | grep XFree86)Affected if XFree86 is installed and version matches 3.3.6, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.1.0, 4.2.0, or 4.2.1
-
Confirm XFree86 is the active X serverRun 'xdpyinfo' or check the X server process (ps aux | grep X) to determine if XFree86 is running versus X.orgAffected if XFree86 is the running X server (not X.org or another X server) and version is in the affected list
-
Verify X server is runningCheck for active X server process: 'ps aux | grep -E "XFree86|Xorg"' or check /var/log/XFree86.0.log for recent startupAffected if An XFree86 X server process is active and version is in the affected range
A user is affected if XFree86 version 3.3.6 through 4.2.1 is installed AND running as the active X server, as the integer overflow in pixmap handling is exploitable through client applications rendering crafted images.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to XFree86 4.3.0 or later, or migrate to X.org (the XFree86 successor), as XFree86 is obsolete and no longer maintained.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-2495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.vupen.com
- ftp.sco.com
- patches.sgi.com
- marc.info
- securitytracker.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- support.avaya.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.novell.com
- www.novell.com
- www.osvdb.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.ubuntu.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-2495 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data