DiscoveryApplication · Symantec

CVE-2005-3316

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-10-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The installation of ON Symantec Discovery 4.5.x and Symantec Discovery 6.0 creates the (1) DiscoveryWeb and (2) DiscoveryRO database accounts with null passwords, which could allow attackers to gain privileges or prevent Discovery from running by setting another password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Symantec Discovery 4.5.x and 6.0 installer creates two database accounts (DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO) with null/empty passwords by default. This default credential vulnerability allows unauthorized attackers to gain database privileges or cause denial of service by changing the account passwords.

MitigationImmediately assign strong, unique passwords to the DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO database accounts, or disable these accounts if unused. Update any configuration files referencing these credentials to reflect the new passwords.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DiscoveryApplication
Affected:= 6.0
On Command DiscoveryApplication
Affected:= standard_4.5= web_4.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify product installation and version
    Identify if Symantec Discovery or Symantec On Command Discovery is installed. Check the installed version against the affected ranges: 6.0, standard_4.5, or web_4.5.
    Affected if The installed version matches 6.0, 4.5 standard, or 4.5 web.
  2. Locate the database used by Discovery
    Examine the Discovery configuration files or registry entries to identify the database type (Sybase, MS SQL, or Oracle) and connection parameters. Look for database connection strings or service configurations.
    Affected if The database is configured and accessible.
  3. Identify database accounts DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO
    Connect to the Discovery database using administrative credentials and query for user accounts. Look for user entries named DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO in the database user tables.
    Affected if Both DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO accounts exist in the database.
  4. Check account password status
    Attempt to authenticate to the database using DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO accounts with empty/null passwords, or query the database user password status fields if accessible.
    Affected if Authentication succeeds with empty password or password fields are null/empty.
  5. Verify account privileges
    Once authenticated with these accounts, query the account privileges or roles to confirm the access level granted to DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO.
    Affected if The accounts have elevated database privileges (such as db_owner, read-write access).

The environment is affected if Symantec Discovery 6.0 or On Command Discovery 4.5 is installed and the DiscoveryWeb or DiscoveryRO database accounts exist with empty or null passwords.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately assign strong, unique passwords to the DiscoveryWeb and DiscoveryRO database accounts, or disable these accounts if unused. Update any configuration files referencing these credentials to reflect the new passwords.

Fix this in Discovery Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-3316 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-3316 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data