TalkApplication · Google

CVE-2005-3899

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-11-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
63/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The automatic update feature in Google Talk allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) by poisoning a target's DNS cache and causing a large update file to be sent, which consumes large amounts of CPU and memory during the signature verification, aka BenjiBug.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This vulnerability exists in Google Talk's automatic update feature. Attackers exploit DNS cache poisoning to redirect the update check to a malicious server, causing the client to download and attempt to verify a large update file. The signature verification process consumes excessive CPU and memory resources, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationSince Google Talk is deprecated/discontinued, no active mitigation is available. Organizations should ensure legacy Google Talk installations are removed. For similar update mechanisms, implement TLS-based endpoint validation, certificate pinning, and proper DNS spoofing protections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TalkApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Detect Google Talk installation
    Search for googleTalk.exe or gtalk.exe in common installation directories: C:\Program Files\Google\Google Talk\, C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Google Talk\, or check Start Menu for Google Talk shortcuts. On Linux/Mac, check /Applications and ~/Applications for Google Talk.app.
    Affected if Google Talk executable or installation directory is found on the system
  2. Check for running Google Talk process
    Run tasklist (Windows) or ps aux (Linux/Mac) and look for processes named googleTalk.exe, gtalk.exe, or Google Talk. Also check for related processes like updater or plugin modules.
    Affected if A Google Talk process is currently running or was recently running on the system
  3. Verify automatic update configuration
    Examine Google Talk configuration files for update-related settings. Look in the application data folder (typically %APPDATA%\Google\Google Talk\ on Windows or ~/.google/googletalk/ on Linux) for config files that may contain update server URLs or auto-update enable flags.
    Affected if Update configuration files exist and the automatic update feature is enabled or configured to point to update servers
  4. Check for Google Talk startup entries
    Check system startup locations for Google Talk: Windows Registry run keys (HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run, HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run), or startup folders. On Linux, check ~/.config/autostart/ for .desktop files referencing Google Talk.
    Affected if Google Talk is configured to start automatically with the system, implying active use of the application and its update mechanism

If Google Talk is installed on the system with the automatic update feature enabled or configured, the system is affected by this vulnerability and should be removed since no patch is available.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since Google Talk is deprecated/discontinued, no active mitigation is available. Organizations should ensure legacy Google Talk installations are removed. For similar update mechanisms, implement TLS-based endpoint validation, certificate pinning, and proper DNS spoofing protections.

Fix this in Talk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,280.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-3899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-3899 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data