dbcve.org
Lotus DominoApplication · Ibm

CVE-2006-0119

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-01-09
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, due to "potential security issues" as identified by SPR numbers (1) GPKS6C9J67 in Agents, (2) JGAN6B6TZ3 and (3) KSPR699NBP in the Router, (4) GPKS5YQGPT in Security, or (5) HSAO6BNL6Y in the Web Server. NOTE: vector 3 is related to an issue in NROUTER in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.4 FP1, 6.5.5, and 7.0, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted vCal meeting request sent via SMTP (aka SPR# KSPR699NBP).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lotus DominoApplication
Affected:= 6.5.0= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 6.5.3= 6.5.4
Lotus Domino Enterprise ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.5.2= 6.5.4
Lotus NotesApplication
Affected:= 6.5= 6.5.1= 6.5.2= 6.5.3= 6.5.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch secunia.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Lotus Domino/Lotus Notes 6.5.5 or later (IBM has since deprecated these older versions; consider migrating to supported IBM Notes/Domino releases if on legacy infrastructure)

  1. 1. Back up the current Lotus Domino/Notes installation and databases
  2. 2. Review IBM Lotus 6.5.5 release notes for migration considerations
  3. 3. Upgrade Lotus Domino Server from affected versions (6.5.0-6.5.3) to version 6.5.5 or later
  4. 4. Upgrade Lotus Notes clients from affected versions (6.5-6.5.3) to version 6.5.5 or later
  5. 5. Test critical workflows and Domino applications post-upgrade
  6. 6. Verify all SPR fixes (GPKS6C9J67, JGAN6B6TZ3, KSPR699NBP, GPKS5YQGPT, HSAO6BNL6Y) are resolved
Caveat Legacy Domino databases or custom scripts may require testing/updates for 6.5.5 compatibility; very old installations may have custom integrations that need review

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can apply and verify the patch for your build — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the patch applied

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-0119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-0119 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data