V WebmailApplication

CVE-2006-0794

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-02-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
help.php in V-webmail 1.6.2 allows remote attackers to obtain the installation path via unspecified invalid parameters. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

V-webmail 1.6.2 help.php contains an information disclosure vulnerability that exposes the application's installation path when invalid parameters are provided. This path disclosure could aid attackers in reconnaissance for further attacks against the system.

MitigationUpgrade V-webmail to the latest version or patch the help.php file to prevent path disclosure errors. If upgrade is not feasible, implement proper error handling that does not reveal system paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
V WebmailApplication
Affected:= 1.6.1= 1.6.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate V-webmail installation directory
    Search the web server document root for directories containing 'v-webmail', 'webmail', or 'vwebmail' folders. Check common paths like /var/www/, /home/*/public_html/, C:\inetpub\wwwroot\, or use 'find / -name "help.php" -path "*webmail*" 2>/dev/null' on Linux/Unix systems.
    Affected if V-webmail is found installed on the system
  2. Identify V-webmail version
    Check the version.php file typically located in the V-webmail root directory, or examine the main index.php or a README file for version information. Look for strings like '1.6.1' or '1.6.2'.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.6.1 or 1.6.2
  3. Verify help.php exists
    Check for the presence of help.php in the V-webmail installation directory. Common path: /path/to/v-webmail/help.php. On Windows IIS, check C:\inetpub\wwwroot\v-webmail\help.php or similar.
    Affected if The file help.php exists in the V-webmail directory
  4. Test for path disclosure vulnerability
    Using a web browser or curl command, request the help.php file with invalid parameters, for example: curl "http://TARGET/v-webmail/help.php?module=invalid" or "http://TARGET/v-webmail/help.php?action=nonexistent". Inspect the response for full file system paths.
    Affected if The response contains absolute file system paths such as /var/www/html/v-webmail/ or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\v-webmail\
  5. Check web server error logs
    Examine the web server error logs (Apache error.log, IIS HTTP logs, or Nginx error.log) for entries related to help.php with invalid parameters. Look for path disclosure in error messages.
    Affected if Error logs show full installation paths in error messages triggered by help.php

The system is affected if V-webmail versions 1.6.1 or 1.6.2 are installed and the help.php file exposes installation paths when accessed with invalid parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade V-webmail to the latest version or patch the help.php file to prevent path disclosure errors. If upgrade is not feasible, implement proper error handling that does not reveal system paths.

Fix this in V Webmail Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-0794 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-0794 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data