CVE-2006-1671
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedControl cards for Cisco Optical Networking System (ONS) 15000 series nodes before 20060405 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (card reset) via (1) a "crafted" IP packet to a device with secure mode EMS-to-network-element access, aka bug ID CSCsc51390; (2) a "crafted" IP packet to a device with IP on the LAN interface, aka bug ID CSCsd04168; and (3) a "malformed" OSPF packet, aka bug ID CSCsc54558.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDenial of service vulnerability in Cisco ONS 15000 series optical networking nodes allows remote attackers to cause card resets via three vectors: crafted IP packets targeting devices with secure mode EMS-to-network-element access, crafted IP packets to devices with IP on the LAN interface, and malformed OSPF packets. The vulnerability affects versions prior to the 20060405 patch release.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0.x= 1.0= 1.1= 1.1\(0\)= 1.1\(1\)= 1.3\(0\)= 3.0= 3.1.0= 3.2= 3.3.0= 3.4.0= 4.0\(1\)= 4.0\(2\)= 0= 0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco ONS device modelQuery the device hardware inventory or use 'show version' command to confirm the device is an ONS 15000 series node (ONS 15310, ONS 15600, or ONS 15454)Affected if Device is not an ONS 15000 series platform - not affected
-
Check installed software versionUse 'show version' or access Cisco Transport Controller to determine the exact software/firmware version. Compare against the affected versions: Cisco Transport Controller 4.0.x, Cisco Optical Networking Systems Software versions 1.0 through 4.0(2), and any version of ONS 15454 MSPPAffected if Running any version prior to the 20060405 patch release or version not listed as fixed
-
Verify IP configuration on LAN interfaceCheck device network configuration for any IP address assigned to the LAN interface using 'show ip interface' or through CTC network settingsAffected if IP address is configured on the LAN interface - vulnerable to crafted IP packet attack vector
-
Check if secure mode EMS access is enabledReview EMS-to-network-element access configuration in Cisco Transport Controller or via CLI to determine if secure mode access is configuredAffected if Secure mode EMS-to-network-element access is enabled - vulnerable to crafted IP packet attack vector
-
Verify OSPF protocol configurationCheck running configuration or use 'show ip ospf' to determine if OSPF is enabled on any interfaceAffected if OSPF is enabled and running - vulnerable to malformed OSPF packet attack vector
Device is affected if it is a Cisco ONS 15000 series node running software versions prior to the April 5, 2006 patch release AND has at least one of these enabled: IP on LAN interface, secure mode EMS access, or OSPF protocol.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco ONS 15000 series nodes to firmware versions released on or after April 5, 2006. Additionally, filter or disable OSPF on the affected interfaces if not required, and implement network segmentation to limit exposure of the optical networking elements to untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-1671 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-1671 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data