PloneApplication

CVE-2006-1711

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-04-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Plone 2.0.5, 2.1.2, and 2.5-beta1 does not restrict access to the (1) changeMemberPortrait, (2) deletePersonalPortrait, and (3) testCurrentPassword methods, which allows remote attackers to modify portraits.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Plone versions 2.0.5, 2.1.2, and 2.5-beta1 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability where three methods (changeMemberPortrait, deletePersonalPortrait, and testCurrentPortrait) lack proper access control checks, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized remote attackers to modify member portrait images.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on the affected methods to ensure only authorized users can modify their own portrait images. This typically involves adding role-based access control (RBAC) checks or using Plone's permission system.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PloneApplication
Affected:= 2.0.5= 2.1.2= 2.5_beta1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Plone version
    Access the ZMI (Zope Management Interface) through /manage or check the 'portal_migrations' tool via the Plone setup, or inspect the 'Products/PlonePortal/VERSION' file if accessible
    Affected if The installed version matches 2.0.5, 2.1.2, or 2.5-beta1 exactly
  2. Verify member portrait feature is enabled
    Check if the 'Member' content type is available in the portal by accessing the 'portal_types' tool in the ZMI, or confirm that users can access their personal preferences
    Affected if The member portrait functionality is present and users have personal folders or profile access
  3. Test unauthenticated access to changeMemberPortrait method
    Attempt an HTTP POST request to /manage_changeMemberPortrait or /portal_memberdata/changeMemberPortrait without authentication, checking if the request is accepted without login
    Affected if The method accepts requests without requiring authentication or valid authorization credentials
  4. Test unauthenticated access to deletePersonalPortrait method
    Attempt an HTTP POST request to /manage_deletePersonalPortrait or /portal_memberdata/deletePersonalPortrait without authentication
    Affected if The method accepts unauthenticated requests and executes without access control validation
  5. Confirm portal_memberdata tool is exposed
    Access the 'portal_memberdata' object through the ZMI at /portal_memberdata and inspect whether the changeMemberPortrait, deletePersonalPortrait, and testCurrentPortrait methods exist
    Affected if All three methods are present in portal_memberdata without explicit access restrictions configured

A user is affected if running Plone version 2.0.5, 2.1.2, or 2.5-beta1 with the member portrait feature enabled and the affected methods are accessible without proper authentication checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on the affected methods to ensure only authorized users can modify their own portrait images. This typically involves adding role-based access control (RBAC) checks or using Plone's permission system.

Fix this in Plone Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-1711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-1711 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data