CVE-2006-2761
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in Hitachi HITSENSER3 HITSENSER3/PRP, HITSENSER3/PUP, HITSENSER3/STP, and HITSENSER3/EUP allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown attack vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Hitachi HITSENSER3 product line (PRP, PUP, STP, EUP variants) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. The CVSS 6.4 indicates the vulnerability is exploitable remotely but may require some authentication or specific conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= eup= prp= pup= stpCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hitachi HITSENSER3 deploymentSearch inventory systems, installed software lists, or documentation for Hitachi HITSENSER3 or related Hitachi security product referencesAffected if The software is found in the environment
-
Determine the specific variantCheck system documentation, configuration files, or product labeling for variant designator: eup, prp, pup, or stpAffected if Any of these variants (eup, prp, pup, stp) are present
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the HITSENSER3 web management console via browser or curl from internal network, typically on ports 80/443 or vendor-specified portsAffected if The web interface is reachable over the network
-
Check authentication stateDetermine if the web interface is protected by authentication or publicly accessible without credentialsAffected if The interface is accessible without authentication or uses default credentials
-
Assess input handling in database featuresReview any accessible database query functions, search features, or reporting modules that accept user input for evidence of unsanitized parametersAffected if User-supplied input appears to be passed directly to database queries without visible parameterization
If Hitachi HITSENSER3 (any variant: eup, prp, pup, stp) is deployed and its web interface is network-accessible with unsanitized user input in database interactions, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions and contact Hitachi for available patches or vendor guidance specific to this product line.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-2761 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-2761 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data