Webinsta CmsApplication · Webinsta

CVE-2006-4217

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-08-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.3.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in modules/usersonline/users.php in WEBInsta CMS 0.3.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the module_dir parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4196. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained from third party information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Remote file inclusion vulnerability in WEBInsta CMS 0.3.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code by supplying a URL in the module_dir parameter to modules/usersonline/users.php. The parameter is not validated, enabling inclusion of malicious remote PHP files.

MitigationUpgrade from the obsolete WEBInsta CMS 0.3.1 to a supported CMS platform; if continued use is required, implement strict input validation on the module_dir parameter and disable allow_url_include in PHP configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Webinsta CmsApplication
Affected:<= 0.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm WEBInsta CMS installation
    Locate the CMS installation directory and check for version indicators such as a version.php file, a readme file, or the main index.php file which may contain version information. Look for files like 'version.txt', 'readme.txt', or inspect the source code for a version constant.
    Affected if The installed version is WEBInsta CMS 0.3.1 or any earlier version (version <= 0.3.1)
  2. Verify vulnerable file presence
    Check if the file modules/usersonline/users.php exists in the web root or CMS installation directory.
    Affected if The file modules/usersonline/users.php exists on the server
  3. Check PHP allow_url_include setting
    Create a PHP script with '<?php phpinfo(); ?>' and access it in a browser, or check the PHP configuration file (php.ini) for the 'allow_url_include' directive.
    Affected if allow_url_include is set to On (enabled) in PHP configuration - this is required for remote file inclusion to succeed
  4. Inspect module_dir parameter usage
    Examine the source code of modules/usersonline/users.php and look for include or require statements that use the module_dir parameter without validation, such as 'include($module_dir . "/something")' or 'require($module_dir)'
    Affected if The code contains unsanitized include/require statements using the module_dir parameter without proper validation

You are affected if WEBInsta CMS version 0.3.1 or lower is installed, the vulnerable file modules/usersonline/users.php exists, and PHP allow_url_include is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.3.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade from the obsolete WEBInsta CMS 0.3.1 to a supported CMS platform; if continued use is required, implement strict input validation on the module_dir parameter and disable allow_url_include in PHP configuration.

Fix this in Webinsta Cms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-4217 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-4217 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data