Bsq SitestatsApplication · Joomla

CVE-2006-4995

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-09-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in BSQ Sitestats (bsq_sitestats) before 2.1.1 for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Remote file inclusion vulnerability in BSQ Sitestats component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter, enabling complete system compromise through inclusion of malicious remote files.

MitigationUpgrade to BSQ Sitestats version 2.1.1 or later, or implement proper input validation/sanitization on the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter to prevent arbitrary file inclusion.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bsq SitestatsApplication
Affected:= 2.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if BSQ Sitestats component is installed
    Check for the presence of the BSQ Sitestats component directory in the Joomla installation, typically found at /components/com_bsq_sitestats/ or search for files containing 'bsq_sitestats' in the components folder
    Affected if The component directory exists on the server
  2. Determine the installed version of BSQ Sitestats
    Examine the component's version file, manifest XML, or any version.php file within the BSQ Sitestats component directory. Common locations include /components/com_bsq_sitestats/bsqSitestats.xml or a version.php file within the component folder
    Affected if The version is exactly 2.1.1 (as indicated by = 2.1.1 in the affected versions)
  3. Inspect the component for vulnerable include statements
    Review the PHP files in the BSQ Sitestats component for usage of the mosConfig_absolute_path variable in include, require, or similar statements. Search for patterns like 'include($mosConfig_absolute_path' or 'require($mosConfig_absolute_path'
    Affected if The code uses mosConfig_absolute_path in dynamic file inclusion without sanitization
  4. Test for exposed mosConfig_absolute_path parameter
    Attempt a controlled test by submitting a GET or POST request to any BSQ Sitestats component file with a test value for mosConfig_absolute_path (e.g., ?mosConfig_absolute_path=http://example.com) and observe if the application attempts to include the supplied value
    Affected if The application processes the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter without validation
  5. Check for signs of compromise or malicious inclusions
    Review web server access logs and application logs for requests to BSQ Sitestats URLs containing suspicious values in mosConfig_absolute_path, such as remote URLs, common web shell patterns, or base64-encoded commands
    Affected if Historical or current log entries show attempts to exploit this RFI vulnerability

The system is affected if BSQ Sitestats version 2.1.1 is installed and the component uses the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter in dynamic file inclusions without validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to BSQ Sitestats version 2.1.1 or later, or implement proper input validation/sanitization on the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter to prevent arbitrary file inclusion.

Fix this in Bsq Sitestats Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-4995 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-4995 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data