Superstack 3 Switch 4400Hardware / appliance · 3com

CVE-2006-5382

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-10-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
3Com Switch SS3 4400 switches, firmware 5.11, 6.00 and 6.10 and earlier, allow remote attackers to read the SNMP Read-Write Community string and conduct unauthorized actions via unspecified "normally restricted management packets on the device" that cause the community string to be returned.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The 3Com Switch SS3 4400 has a vulnerability where the SNMP read-write community string is exposed through certain management packets that should normally be restricted. This allows remote attackers to obtain the community string and make unauthorized configuration changes to the switch.

MitigationUpdate firmware to a version newer than 6.10, or implement network access controls to restrict SNMP management access to trusted IP addresses only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Superstack 3 Switch 4400Hardware / appliance
Affected:<= firmware_6.10= firmware_5.11= firmware_6.00

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the switch firmware version
    Access the switch management interface (web GUI or console) and locate the firmware version information, typically found under System Information, Hardware Status, or Device Details. On console, the 'show version' or 'show system' command often displays the firmware revision.
    Affected if The firmware version is 5.11, 6.00, or any version 6.10 or lower (including 6.1.0, 6.0.1, etc.)
  2. Confirm SNMP is enabled
    Check the switch SNMP configuration through the management interface. Look for SNMP settings under Configuration, Services, or Management options. From console, 'show snmp' or 'show snmp community' typically displays SNMP status and community strings.
    Affected if SNMP (especially SNMP read-write community) is enabled on the switch
  3. Determine SNMP access scope
    Review SNMP access control lists or management station restrictions. Check whether SNMP is accessible from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0), from multiple subnets, or only from specific trusted management IP addresses. In the web interface, look for 'SNMP Access' or 'Manager IP' fields.
    Affected if SNMP management is not restricted to specific trusted IP addresses or is accessible from untrusted networks
  4. Inspect for recent unauthorized changes
    Review switch logs, audit trails, or configuration change logs for unexpected modifications to switch settings, particularly SNMP community string changes, VLAN modifications, or port configuration changes that were not performed by authorized administrators.
    Affected if Configuration changes exist that were not performed by known, authorized administrators

You are affected if your 3Com Superstack 3 Switch 4400 runs firmware version 5.11, 6.00, or any version up to 6.10 AND has SNMP enabled with community strings potentially exposed to untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update firmware to a version newer than 6.10, or implement network access controls to restrict SNMP management access to trusted IP addresses only.

Fix this in Superstack 3 Switch 4400 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-5382 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-5382 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data