ProftpdApplication · Proftpd Project

CVE-2006-5815

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-11-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Stack-based buffer overflow in the sreplace function in ProFTPD 1.3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers, probably authenticated, to cause a denial of service and execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated by vd_proftpd.pm, a "ProFTPD remote exploit."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in the sreplace function in ProFTPD versions 1.3.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via specially crafted input.

MitigationUpgrade ProFTPD to version 1.3.0a or later which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict FTP access to trusted users only and implement network segmentation to reduce exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ProftpdApplication
Affected:<= 1.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ProFTPD installation and version
    Run `proftpd -v` or check the package manager (e.g., `rpm -q proftpd`, `dpkg -l proftpd`) to retrieve the installed ProFTPD version number.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.3.0 or any earlier version (e.g., 1.2.x, 1.1.x, 1.0.x).
  2. Confirm ProFTPD service is running
    Check if the ProFTPD daemon is active using commands like `ps aux | grep proftpd`, `systemctl status proftpd`, or by testing FTP connectivity on port 21.
    Affected if The ProFTPD service is running and accepting connections, making it accessible to potential attackers.
  3. Verify FTP access is enabled for users
    Review the ProFTPD configuration file (typically `/etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf` or `/etc/proftpd.conf`) to confirm that FTP access is not restricted to localhost only and that user authentication is enabled.
    Affected if Remote user authentication is permitted, allowing external users to log in and trigger the vulnerable sreplace function.

The system is affected if ProFTPD version 1.3.0 or earlier is installed and running with accessible FTP authentication enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ProFTPD to version 1.3.0a or later which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict FTP access to trusted users only and implement network segmentation to reduce exposure.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

ProFTPD 1.3.1 or later (1.3.1 was released to address this vulnerability)

  1. 1. Back up the current ProFTPD configuration files (typically in /etc/proftpd/ or /etc/) 2. Stop the ProFTPD service: 'service proftpd stop' or 'systemctl stop proftpd' 3. Download ProFTPD version 1.3.1 or later from the official ProFTPD website (ftp.proftpd.org) or your distribution's package repository 4. Install the new version using your distribution's package manager or compile from source wi
Caveat Review configuration for compatibility with newer versions; some directives may be deprecated in later releases

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Proftpd Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-5815 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-5815 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data