CVE-2006-6076
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Tape Engine (tapeeng.exe) in CA (formerly Computer Associates) BrightStor ARCserve Backup 11.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via certain RPC requests to TCP port 6502.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Tape Engine (tapeeng.exe) component of CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup 11.5 and earlier. The vulnerability is exploitable through specially crafted RPC requests sent to TCP port 6502, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.5= 11.1= 11.5= 11= 11.1= 11.0= 11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BrightStor ARCserve Backup installation and versionCheck installed programs in Control Panel > Programs and Features, or query the Windows Registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{ProductCode} for the DisplayVersion value, or run 'tapeeng.exe -version' if availableAffected if The installed version is 11.5, 11.1, 11, or any version earlier than or equal to 11.5
-
Confirm Tape Engine component is presentLocate the file tapeeng.exe on the system. Common paths include C:\Program Files\CA\BrightStor ARCserve Backup\ or C:\Program Files\CA\ARCserve Backup\. Use 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq tapeeng.exe"' to check if the process is running, or 'where /R C:\ tapeeng.exe' to find the executableAffected if tapeeng.exe exists on the system and is running as a service
-
Check if TCP port 6502 is listeningRun 'netstat -an | findstr :6502' or use a port scanner against localhost on TCP port 6502. Also verify in Windows Firewall or registry that the port is openAffected if TCP port 6502 is in LISTENING state or open in the firewall, indicating the RPC service is active for the Tape Engine
-
Verify RPC service configuration for Tape EngineCheck Windows Services console (services.msc) for the 'CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup Tape Engine' service, or check registry under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\CASABTPE for Start type. The RPC listener for port 6502 is enabled by default when the service runsAffected if The Tape Engine service is set to Automatic or Manual start and is currently running
-
Compare installed version to affected rangesDocument the exact version number from step 1 and compare against the affected versions: 11.5, 11.1, 11, or any version <= 11.5. Contact Broadcom/CA support if version cannot be determinedAffected if The installed version falls within <= 11.5, or specifically matches 11, 11.1, or 11.5
A system is affected if CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup version 11.5 or earlier is installed, the Tape Engine (tapeeng.exe) service is running, and TCP port 6502 is open and listening for RPC requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup. If immediate patching is not feasible, block or restrict access to TCP port 6502 at the network perimeter until the upgrade can be completed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6076 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6076 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data