CVE-2006-6502
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse-after-free vulnerability in the LiveConnect bridge code for Mozilla Firefox 2.x before 2.0.0.1, 1.5.x before 1.5.0.9, Thunderbird before 1.5.0.9, and SeaMonkey before 1.0.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in LiveConnect bridge code (Java/JS integration) allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via memory corruption. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management when handling LiveConnect objects, leading todangling pointer dereference.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5= 1.5.0.1= 1.5.0.2= 1.5.0.3= 1.5.0.4= 1.5.0.5= 1.5.0.6= 1.5.0.7= 1.5.0.8= 2.0= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 0.1= 0.2= 0.3= 0.4= 0.5= 0.6= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.8= 0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Mozilla productCheck which Mozilla application is installed: Firefox, SeaMonkey, or Thunderbird. This can be done via the application's Help > About menu, or by checking the executable name and properties.Affected if Any of the three products (Firefox, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird) is installed
-
Determine the installed version numberAccess Help > About in the application menu, or run the executable with --version flag if available, or check the program files directory for version metadata.Affected if The version matches any of the affected versions listed for that product
-
Compare against affected version listFor Firefox: versions 1.5, 1.5.0.1 through 1.5.0.8, and 2.0 are affected. For SeaMonkey: versions 1.0, 1.0.1 through 1.0.6 are affected. For Thunderbird: versions 0.1 through 0.9 are affected.Affected if The installed version exactly matches one of the listed affected versions (note: Thunderbird 0.1 through 0.9 are all affected; Firefox 1.5.x series and 2.0; SeaMonkey 1.0.x series)
If the installed Mozilla product version exactly matches one of the versions listed in the affected products (Firefox 1.5, 1.5.0.1-1.5.0.8, or 2.0; SeaMonkey 1.0-1.0.6; Thunderbird 0.1-0.9), the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to patched versions: Firefox 2.0.0.1+, Firefox 1.5.0.9+, Thunderbird 1.5.0.9+, or SeaMonkey 1.0.7+. This is a straightforward version upgrade with no code changes required.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6502 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- patches.sgi.com
- fedoranews.org
- fedoranews.org
- h20000.www2.hp.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- securitytracker.com
- securitytracker.com
- securitytracker.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.novell.com
- www.novell.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- issues.rpath.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6502 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data