Antivirus Plus FirewallApplication · Avg

CVE-2006-6623

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-12-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Sygate Personal Firewall 5.6.2808 relies on the Process Environment Block (PEB) to identify a process, which allows local users to bypass the product's controls on a process by spoofing the (1) ImagePathName, (2) CommandLine, and (3) WindowTitle fields in the PEB.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Sygate Personal Firewall 5.6.2808 identifies processes for its security controls by reading fields from the Process Environment Block (PEB), specifically ImagePathName, CommandLine, and WindowTitle. Local users can manipulate these PEB fields to spoof process identity, allowing them to bypass the firewall's access controls and restrictions.

MitigationThis is a legacy, unsupported product (Sygate Personal Firewall was discontinued circa 2005-2006). Organizations should migrate to a supported modern firewall solution, as no vendor patch is available for this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Antivirus Plus FirewallApplication
Affected:= 7.5.431
Comodo Personal FirewallApplication
Affected:= 2.3.6.81
Personal FirewallApplication
Affected:= 3.0.8686
AntihookApplication
Affected:= 3.0.23
Look N StopApplication
Affected:= 2.05p2
Sygate Personal FirewallApplication
Affected:= 5.6.2808

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check for Sygate Personal Firewall installation
    Search for Sygate Personal Firewall in installed programs or check for SPF executable files on the system
    Affected if Sygate Personal Firewall version 5.6.2808 is installed
  2. Check for Comodo Personal Firewall installation
    Search for Comodo Personal Firewall in installed programs or check for CFP executable files
    Affected if Comodo Personal Firewall version 2.3.6.81 is installed
  3. Check for AVG Antivirus Plus Firewall installation
    Search for AVG Antivirus Plus Firewall in installed programs
    Affected if AVG Antivirus Plus Firewall version 7.5.431 is installed
  4. Check for Filseclab Personal Firewall installation
    Search for Filseclab Personal Firewall in installed programs
    Affected if Filseclab Personal Firewall version 3.0.8686 is installed
  5. Check for Infoprocess Antihook installation
    Search for Antihook in installed programs
    Affected if Infoprocess Antihook version 3.0.23 is installed
  6. Check for Soft4ever Look N Stop installation
    Search for Look N Stop in installed programs
    Affected if Soft4ever Look N Stop version 2.05p2 is installed

The system is affected if any of these specific firewall products at exactly the listed versions are installed, as the vulnerability allows local users to spoof process identity via manipulated PEB fields to bypass security controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

This is a legacy, unsupported product (Sygate Personal Firewall was discontinued circa 2005-2006). Organizations should migrate to a supported modern firewall solution, as no vendor patch is available for this vulnerability.

Fix this in Antivirus Plus Firewall Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6623 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data