CVE-2006-6705
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the template files in Soumu Workflow for Groupmax 01-00 through 01-01, Soumu Workflow 02-00 through 03-03, and Koukyoumuke Soumu Workflow 01-00 through 01-01 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms on web pages via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthentication bypass vulnerability in template files of Soumu Workflow for Groupmax (versions 01-00 to 01-01), Soumu Workflow (versions 02-00 to 03-03), and Koukyoumuke Soumu Workflow (versions 01-00 to 01-01). The unspecified vulnerabilities in the template system allow remote attackers to circumvent authentication mechanisms on web pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 01-00= 01-01= 01_00= 01_01= 02-00= 02-01= 03-03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed productLocate and identify any of the following Fujitsu Soumu workflow products: Soumu Workflow for Groupmax, Soumu Workflow, or Koukyoumuke Soumu Workflow. Check installed software listings, documentation, or system inventory for these product names.Affected if Any of the three named workflow products is installed on the system
-
Check product versionDetermine the installed version of the workflow product. Consult the product's about screen, version info in control panels, or check version metadata in the installation directory. Compare the version number against these ranges: Groupmax 01-00 to 01-01, Workflow 02-00 to 03-03, Koukyoumuke Workflow 01-00 to 01-01.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges specified above
-
Verify web template interface is exposedDetermine if the web interface for the workflow system is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS from the network. Check if the web server component (typically running on ports 80, 443, or a custom port) is listening and reachable.Affected if The web interface is network-accessible and the product version is affected
-
Inspect template file accessibilityExamine the template files used by the workflow system. These are typically stored in web-accessible directories. Check if unauthenticated HTTP requests can access or invoke template files without being redirected to a login page.Affected if Template files can be accessed or executed without authentication
A system is affected if it runs any of the three Soumu workflow products with versions 01-00 through 03-03 and has its web-based template system exposed to the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the affected workflow systems and review template file permissions and authentication logic.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-6705 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-6705 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data