CVE-2006-7161
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in giris_yap.asp in Hazir Site 2.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via the (1) k_a class or (2) sifre parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the giris_yap.asp login script of Hazir Site 2.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by injecting SQL commands through the k_a (username) or sifre (password) parameters. Successful exploitation grants unauthorized access to the application's authenticated functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Hazir Site installationSearch the web root directory for files named 'giris_yap.asp' or check for the presence of 'Hazir Site' or 'Aspindir' in application files and headersAffected if The application is running Aspindir Hazirsite software
-
Verify the version is 2.0Check version metadata in the application's about page, readme file, or the giris_yap.asp file header for version identifiersAffected if The installed version is exactly 2.0
-
Locate the vulnerable login scriptFind the file giris_yap.asp in the web application directory structureAffected if The file giris_yap.asp exists in the application
-
Inspect the login parametersOpen giris_yap.asp and examine the code handling the k_a (username) and sifre (password) parameters; look for direct insertion into SQL queries without using parameterized queries or input sanitizationAffected if The parameters k_a and sifre are used directly in SQL queries without proper escaping or prepared statements
-
Test for SQL injection vulnerabilitySubmit SQL metacharacters (such as ' OR '1'='1) in the k_a or sifre login fields and observe if authentication bypass occurs or database errors are returnedAffected if Authentication can be bypassed or SQL errors are returned when special characters are submitted in login fields
The environment is affected if Aspindir Hazirsite version 2.0 is running and the giris_yap.asp script uses the k_a and sifre parameters in unprotected SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the giris_yap.asp file, and implement strict input validation on all user-supplied login parameters before using them in database queries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-7161 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-7161 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data