HTTP ServerWeb server / proxy · Apache

CVE-2007-0086

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-01-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Apache HTTP Server, when accessed through a TCP connection with a large window size, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network bandwidth consumption) via a Range header that specifies multiple copies of the same fragment. NOTE: the severity of this issue has been disputed by third parties, who state that the large window size required by the attack is not normally supported or configured by the server, or that a DDoS-style attack would accomplish the same goal

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Apache HTTP Server contains a denial-of-service vulnerability where specially crafted HTTP Range headers specifying duplicate fragments, when used with TCP connections supporting large window sizes, can cause excessive bandwidth consumption. The attack exploits how Apache processes Range header requests by specifying multiple copies of the same byte range.

MitigationUpgrade Apache HTTP Server to a patched version or implement Range header request limits/rate limiting at the web application firewall or server level to mitigate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HTTP ServerWeb server / proxy
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Apache HTTP Server is running
    Check for httpd or apache2 processes using 'ps aux | grep -E "httpd|apache2"' or check if port 80/443 is listening using 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E ":80|:443"'
    Affected if Apache HTTP Server is running and accessible on the network
  2. Determine installed Apache version
    Run 'httpd -v' (RHEL/CentOS) or 'apache2 -v' (Debian/Ubuntu) or check the server banner via 'curl -I http://localhost'
    Affected if Any version of Apache HTTP Server is installed (the vulnerability affects all versions)
  3. Confirm Range header processing is enabled
    Send a request with a Range header to the server: 'curl -H "Range: bytes=0-10" http://localhost/' and verify a 206 Partial Content response is returned
    Affected if The server responds with 206 Partial Content, indicating Range header processing is active and the server could be exploited
  4. Check TCP window size configuration (optional context)
    Review the server's network configuration and TCP settings. Large receive/send window sizes (e.g., above default) can be verified via 'sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_rmem' and 'sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_wmem'
    Affected if TCP window scaling is enabled and large values are configured, which would make the attack more effective

If Apache HTTP Server is running with Range header processing enabled (default), the environment is affected by this vulnerability regardless of version, especially when TCP window scaling is active.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Apache HTTP Server to a patched version or implement Range header request limits/rate limiting at the web application firewall or server level to mitigate this vulnerability.

Fix this in HTTP Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0086 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0086 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data