dbcve.org
Weblogic ServerApplication · Bea

CVE-2007-0417

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-01-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
BEA WebLogic Server 7.0 through 7.0 SP7, 8.1 through 8.1 SP5, 9.0, and 9.1, when using the WebLogic Server 6.1 compatibility realm, allows attackers to execute certain EJB container persistence operations with an administrative identity.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Weblogic ServerApplication
Affected:<= 7.0= 7.0= 8.1= 9.0= 9.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.0
Vendor patch dev2dev.bea.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to WebLogic Server 10.x or 12c (modern supported versions) - the 6.1 compatibility realm was deprecated and removed in later versions

  1. 1. Identify all WebLogic Server instances using the WebLogic Server 6.1 compatibility realm configuration
  2. 2. Review the application to determine if the 6.1 compatibility realm is still required for legacy functionality
  3. 3. If the 6.1 compatibility realm is not required, reconfigure the application to use the default security realm
  4. 4. If legacy compatibility is required, plan migration to a supported WebLogic Server version with vendor patches
  5. 5. Apply the vendor patch from BEA (refer to http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/advisory/211) if available for your specific version
  6. 6. After applying patches or upgrades, verify that EJB container persistence operations require proper authentication
Caveat Legacy applications relying on the WebLogic Server 6.1 compatibility realm may require code changes to work with modern WebLogic security models; test thoroughly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0417 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0417 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data