CVE-2007-0455
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the gdImageStringFTEx function in gdft.c in GD Graphics Library 2.0.33 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted string with a JIS encoded font.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the gdImageStringFTEx function in gdft.c within GD Graphics Library 2.0.33 and earlier. The flaw occurs when processing crafted strings with JIS-encoded fonts, allowing remote attackers to potentially crash the application or execute arbitrary code via overflow.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.7= 6.06= 6.10= 7.04= 13= 14= 3.0= 4.0= 3.0= 4.0= 3.0= 4.0<= 2.0.33CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GD library versionFor PHP, run phpinfo() or 'php -i' and look for the GD section showing bundled library version. For standalone GD, check the library file version with 'gdlib-config --version' or examine the shared object file with 'file libgd.so' or check RPM/Deb package version.Affected if version is 2.0.33 or earlier, or for PHP specifically version 4.4.0 through 4.4.6 (less than 4.4.7)
-
Verify FreeType support is enabledIn the PHP GD info, look for 'FreeType' or 'freetype' support. The vulnerable function gdImageStringFTEx is a FreeType-related function, so GD must be compiled with FreeType support for this flaw to apply.Affected if FreeType support is enabled in the GD build
-
Check for gdImageStringFTEx usageSearch application source code for calls to gdImageStringFTEx function. This function is the entry point for the vulnerability. Review code for patterns like 'gdImageStringFTEx' in PHP extensions or C applications using GD.Affected if the application code calls gdImageStringFTEx to render text with fonts
-
Identify font encoding in useExamine font files and font handling code to determine if JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard) encoded fonts are being loaded or processed. Check font path configurations and any font loading code that specifies encoding.Affected if JIS-encoded Japanese fonts are being processed through gdImageStringFTEx
-
Verify OS package version (if using system packages)For Ubuntu, run 'dpkg -l | grep libgd2' or check installed php-gd package version. For Fedora/RHEL, run 'rpm -q gd' or 'rpm -q php-gd'. Compare against known vulnerable versions: Ubuntu 6.06/6.10/7.04, Fedora 13/14, RHEL 3.0/4.0.Affected if the installed package version matches one of the known vulnerable OS releases
You are affected if your GD library version is 2.0.33 or earlier (or PHP 4.4.0-4.4.6), FreeType support is enabled, and your application uses gdImageStringFTEx to process JIS-encoded fonts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.4.7
Upgrade to GD Graphics Library version 2.0.34 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If upgrading is not feasible, implement input validation to restrict string length when processing JIS-encoded fonts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- fedoranews.org
- lists.rpath.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.trustix.org
- issues.rpath.com
- issues.rpath.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0455 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data