CVE-2007-0917
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) feature for Cisco IOS 12.4XE to 12.3T allows remote attackers to bypass IPS signatures that use regular expressions via fragmented packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in Cisco IOS IPS feature (versions 12.4XE to 12.3T), where fragmented packets can be used to bypass IPS signatures that rely on regular expression matching. An attacker can evade detection by fragmenting malicious traffic, allowing it to pass through the IPS without being matched against signatures.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3t= 12.3xq= 12.3xr= 12.3xs= 12.3xw= 12.3xx= 12.3xy= 12.3ya= 12.3yd= 12.3yg= 12.3yh= 12.3yiCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS versionUse 'show version' command on the Cisco device to obtain the installed IOS version numberAffected if The version matches any of these: 12.3t, 12.3xq, 12.3xr, 12.3xs, 12.3xw, 12.3xx, 12.3xy, 12.3ya, 12.3yd, 12.3yg, 12.3yh, or 12.3yi
-
Confirm IPS feature is enabledUse 'show ips' or 'show ip ips' command to verify the Cisco IOS IPS feature is active and signatures are loadedAffected if IPS is enabled and signatures are loaded on the device
-
Check if regex-based signatures are in useUse 'show ip ips signatures' or 'show ips sig' to list loaded signatures and check for signatures that rely on regular expression (regex) pattern matchingAffected if The device has regex-based signatures loaded and active
The device is affected if it runs an affected Cisco IOS version (12.3t through 12.3yi) AND has the IPS feature enabled with regex-based signatures loaded.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Cisco IOS software update that addresses this IPS evasion vulnerability. After updating, verify that IPS signatures are properly detecting both fragmented and non-fragmented traffic.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-0917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-0917 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data