CVE-2007-1056
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware Workstation 5.5.3 build 34685 does not provide per-user restrictions on certain privileged actions, which allows local users to perform restricted operations such as changing system time, accessing hardware components, and stopping the "VMware tools service" service. NOTE: exploitation is simplified via (1) weak file permissions (Users = Read & Execute) for %PROGRAMFILES%\VMware; and weak registry key permissions (access by Users) for (2) vmmouse, (3) vmscsi, (4) VMTools, (5) vmx_svga, and (6) vmxnet in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\; which allows local users to perform various privileged actions outside of the guest OS by executing certain files under %PROGRAMFILES%\VMware\VMware Tools, as demonstrated by (a) VMControlPanel.cpl and (b) vmwareservice.exe.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVMware Workstation 5.5.3 lacks per-user restrictions on privileged operations due to weak ACLs. Local users with standard User privileges can Read/Execute files in %PROGRAMFILES%\VMware and modify registry keys under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\ for vmmouse, vmscsi, VMTools, vmx_svga, and vmxnet, enabling execution of privileged operations like VMControlPanel.cpl and vmwareservice.exe to change system time, access hardware, or stop services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5.3_build_34685CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm VMware Workstation installationCheck for VMware Workstation by examining %PROGRAMFILES%\VMware folder or looking for VMware services in the system. Use 'dir "%PROGRAMFILES%\VMware"' or check Registry: HKLM\SOFTWARE\VMware, Inc.\VMware WorkstationAffected if The VMware Workstation directory or registry key exists on the system
-
Identify installed VMware Workstation versionRun 'vmware -v' or check the version in the registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\VMware, Inc.\VMware Workstation\InstallPath or examine the file properties of vmware.exe in the installation directoryAffected if The version is exactly 5.5.3_build_34685 (only this specific build is affected)
-
Check ACLs on VMware program directoryUse icacls or a similar tool to examine permissions on %PROGRAMFILES%\VMware. Run 'icacls "%PROGRAMFILES%\VMware"' and verify if standard (non-admin) users have Write or Modify permissionsAffected if Standard users have Write, Modify, or Full Control permissions to the VMware program folder
-
Check registry key permissions for affected servicesUse regedit or icacls to examine permissions on HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\vmmouse, vmscsi, VMTools, vmx_svga, and vmxnet. Run 'reg query HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\vmmouse' and check ACLs with 'icacls' or registry permissionsAffected if Standard users can write to any of these service registry keys (they can modify the service configuration)
-
Verify vulnerable executable presenceCheck if VMControlPanel.cpl and vmwareservice.exe exist in the VMware installation directory. Use 'dir "%PROGRAMFILES%\VMware\vmwareservice.exe"' and 'dir "%PROGRAMFILES%\VMware\VMControlPanel.cpl"'Affected if These executables exist and are accessible to standard users (they perform privileged operations)
A system is affected if VMware Workstation 5.5.3_build_34685 is installed AND standard users have write access to the VMware program directory or can modify the affected service registry keys, allowing them to execute privileged operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade VMware Workstation to a version beyond 5.5.3 that enforces proper per-user restrictions and secure ACLs on program files and registry keys, or manually harden permissions on the affected VMware directories and registry keys to remove write access for standard users.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-1056 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-1056 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data