CVE-2007-1327
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SILC_SERVER_CMD_FUNC function in apps/silcd/command.c in silc-server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a request without a cipher algorithm and an invalid HMAC algorithm.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SILC_SERVER_CMD_FUNC function in apps/silcd/command.c of silc-server 1.0.2 suffers from a NULL pointer dereference when processing requests that omit a cipher algorithm and supply an invalid HMAC algorithm. The function fails to validate these algorithm parameters before dereferencing them, causing the daemon to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Silc Server is installedRun 'rpm -q silc-server' or 'dpkg -l | grep silc' or check for /usr/sbin/silcd binaryAffected if silc-server package or binary exists on the system
-
Verify the installed version is 1.0.2Run 'silcd --version' or check package metadata with 'rpm -qi silc-server' or 'dpkg -s silc-server'Affected if Version reported is exactly 1.0.2
-
Check if silc-server daemon is runningRun 'ps aux | grep silcd' or 'systemctl status silcd'Affected if The silcd process is actively running and accepting connections
-
Review logs for crash eventsCheck /var/log/messages, /var/log/syslog, or application-specific logs for segmentation faults or unexpected silcd daemon restartsAffected if Logs show silcd crashes or frequent restarts around the time of connection requests
System is affected only if silc-server version 1.0.2 is installed, the daemon is running and accepting connections, and crash events matching the described NULL pointer dereference pattern are present in logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf silc-server is still in use, apply any available patches from the vendor. Otherwise, migrate to a supported secure chat/communication server solution, as silc-server 1.0.2 is legacy software from 2007.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-1327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-1327 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data