LedgersmbWeb browser

CVE-2007-1329

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-03-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory traversal vulnerability in SQL-Ledger, and LedgerSMB before 1.1.5, allows remote attackers to read and overwrite arbitrary files, and execute arbitrary code, via . (dot) characters adjacent to (1) users and (2) users/members strings, which are removed by blacklisting functions that filter these strings and collapse into .. (dot dot) sequences.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Directory traversal vulnerability in SQL-Ledger and LedgerSMB before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to read/write arbitrary files and execute code by exploiting blacklisting functions that filter dot characters. When dots adjacent to 'users' and 'users/members' strings are filtered, they collapse into '..' sequences, enabling path traversal.

MitigationUpgrade to LedgerSMB 1.1.5 or later. If upgrade unavailable, implement proper path canonicalization with allowlist validation instead of blacklisting dot sequences, and restrict file operations to intended directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LedgersmbWeb browser
Affected:<= 1.1.1
Sql LedgerWeb browser
Affected:= 2.6.25

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed LedgerSMB version
    Locate the version file or check the login/admin interface for the LedgerSMB version number. Common locations include a VERSION file in the installation directory or the version displayed in the web interface footer.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.1 or earlier (any version <= 1.1.1)
  2. Identify installed SQL-Ledger version
    Locate the version file or check the login/admin interface for the SQL-Ledger version number. Common locations include a VERSION file in the installation directory or the version displayed in the web interface.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.6.25 exactly (version = 2.6.25)
  3. Check for vulnerable dot-filtering code
    Inspect the source code files that handle file path operations, specifically looking for blacklisting functions that filter dot characters (.) in paths. Search for functions that process 'users' and 'users/members' path components.
    Affected if Blacklisting functions that filter dots are present in the codebase, and dots adjacent to 'users' or 'users/members' strings can collapse into '..' sequences
  4. Verify web server file access configuration
    Review the web server configuration to determine which directories the application has read/write access to. Check if the web server user can access system files outside the intended application directory.
    Affected if The web server process has permissions to access directories outside the intended LedgerSMB/SQL-Ledger data directory
  5. Inspect HTTP request handling for path parameters
    Review application logs and code to identify if user-supplied path parameters are processed without proper canonicalization. Look for file download or include functionality that uses path parameters.
    Affected if The application accepts path parameters in HTTP requests that are processed without allowlist validation and could contain '..' sequences after dot filtering

You are affected if running LedgerSMB <= 1.1.1 or SQL-Ledger 2.6.25 AND the application uses vulnerable blacklisting functions that filter dots in paths containing 'users' or 'users/members' strings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.1.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to LedgerSMB 1.1.5 or later. If upgrade unavailable, implement proper path canonicalization with allowlist validation instead of blacklisting dot sequences, and restrict file operations to intended directories.

Recommended fix High confidence

LedgerSMB 1.1.5 or later

  1. Upgrade LedgerSMB to version 1.1.5 or later to resolve the directory traversal vulnerability
  2. If using SQL Ledger 2.6.25, contact vendor for patch or consider upgrading to latest stable release
Caveat Minor version upgrades in LedgerSMB may include database schema changes - review release notes and backup database before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ledgersmb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-1329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-1329 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data