CVE-2007-1652
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenID allows remote attackers to forcibly log a user into an OpenID enabled site, divulge the user's personal information to this site, and add it site to the trusted sites list via a crafted web page, related to cached tokens.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis OpenID vulnerability allows remote attackers to exploit cached authentication tokens. By crafting a malicious web page, an attacker can force a user's browser to reuse cached tokens, enabling unauthorized login to OpenID-enabled sites, unauthorized access to the user's personal information, and modification of the user's trusted sites list.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OpenID consumer/provider is in useSearch your codebase, application configuration files, and installed packages for OpenID-related libraries (e.g., python-openid, openid consumer, openid provider) and confirm the OpenID authentication module is enabled.Affected if OpenID authentication is actively used in the application and tokens are being issued or consumed.
-
Inspect token caching configurationReview application configuration files, session settings, and authentication middleware to locate where OpenID tokens are cached. Look for cache storage mechanisms (database, memory, file-based) and check if tokens are stored without time-based expiration.Affected if Tokens are cached with no expiration or with excessively long cache durations that allow reuse beyond intended sessions.
-
Confirm token realm bindingExamine the OpenID library or application code that handles token generation and validation. Check if tokens include a realm or audience field that binds them to a specific relying party URL or identifier.Affected if Tokens are generated without realm binding, allowing them to be valid across different relying parties.
-
Check for token uniqueness validationReview the token validation logic to determine if the system checks for token uniqueness (e.g., replay attack prevention, nonce usage) when processing incoming OpenID authentication responses.Affected if The validation process does not verify token uniqueness, allowing the same token to be replayed.
-
Inspect CSRF protection on OpenID endpointsLocate the OpenID consumer endpoint handling authentication responses. Verify that CSRF tokens or equivalent protections are required for state-changing operations related to token processing.Affected if No CSRF protection exists on OpenID authentication endpoints, enabling forced token reuse attacks.
A user is affected if their OpenID implementation uses uncached or persistently cached tokens without realm binding, lacks token uniqueness validation, and missing CSRF protections on authentication endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper token expiration and invalidation mechanisms, ensure tokens are bound to specific realms, and add CSRF protections to prevent forced token reuse. Additionally, validate token uniqueness and implement secure token storage practices.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-1652 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-1652 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data