CVE-2007-2034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) before 4.0.87.0 allows remote authenticated users to gain the privileges of the SuperUsers group, and manage the application and its networks, related to the group membership of user accounts, aka Bug ID CSCsg05190.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) versions prior to 4.0.87.0 allows remote authenticated users to escalate their privileges to SuperUsers by manipulating group membership settings for user accounts, granting them full administrative control over the application and managed wireless networks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0.95CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco WCS is installedIdentify if Cisco Wireless Control System is deployed in your environment. This is typically a Windows or Linux server running the WCS application. Check for the WCS installation directory or running processes named 'wcs' or similar.Affected if Cisco WCS software is present on the system
-
Determine installed WCS versionLocate the version number of the installed Cisco WCS. This is commonly visible in the WCS web interface under 'Help' > 'About', or stored in version/configuration files on the server (such as version.properties or similar).Affected if Unable to determine the version from the WCS interface or system files
-
Compare version against fixed releaseCompare your installed WCS version number to the fixed release 4.0.87.0. If your version is a 4.0.x release, check if it is less than 4.0.87.0 (for example, 4.0.85.0, 4.0.80.0, etc.).Affected if The installed version is a 4.0.x release prior to 4.0.87.0 (such as 4.0.95, 4.0.90, 4.0.85, etc.)
You are affected if Cisco Wireless Control System is installed and the running version is a 4.0.x release earlier than 4.0.87.0, as versions prior to 4.0.87.0 contain the privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco WCS to version 4.0.87.0 or later, or apply the vendor patch for Bug ID CSCsg05190 to remediate the privilege escalation vector.
Upgrade to Cisco WCS version 4.0.87.0 or later (current recommended stable release)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Cisco Wireless Control System (WCS) by accessing the WCS console or using the CLI command 'show version'
- 2. If the current version is earlier than 4.0.87.0, plan for an upgrade to version 4.0.87.0 or a later stable release
- 3. Review Cisco's WCS upgrade documentation for prerequisites, including disk space, backup requirements, and supported upgrade paths
- 4. Back up the current WCS configuration and database before initiating the upgrade
- 5. Download the WCS software version 4.0.87.0 or later from Cisco's software download center (requires valid Cisco service contract)
- 6. Initiate the upgrade via the WCS web interface under Administration > Software Upgrade, or use the CLI upgrade procedure
- 7. After upgrade completes, verify the new version number and confirm WCS services are operational
- 8. Validate that the SuperUsers group membership functions correctly and that the privilege escalation vulnerability is mitigated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-2034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-2034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data