CVE-2007-2322
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNMMediaServer.exe in Nero MediaHome 2.5.5.0 and CE 1.3.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and application crash) via a crafted packet that contains two CRLF sequences. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNMMediaServer.exe in Nero MediaHome versions 2.5.5.0 and CE 1.3.0.4 contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability when processing a crafted packet containing two CRLF sequences, causing the application to crash and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.5.0= 1.3.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Nero MediaHome versionCheck the program's version information. On Windows, open Add/Remove Programs or Programs and Features, find Nero MediaHome, and view the version. Alternatively, right-click NMMediaServer.exe in the program directory and select Properties > Details to see the File Version.Affected if The version listed is exactly 2.5.5.0 for Nero MediaHome or exactly 1.3.0.4 for Nero MediaHome CE
-
Verify NMMediaServer.exe process is runningOpen Task Manager, go to the Processes or Details tab, and look for NMMediaServer.exe. Alternatively, run 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq NMMediaServer.exe"' from command prompt.Affected if The process NMMediaServer.exe is present and running in memory
-
Confirm network exposure of the media serverCheck if the service is listening on network ports. Run 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' and look for ports typically used by Nero MediaHome (such as 1900, 5353, or 8080). Also check Windows Firewall inbound rules for any rules allowing this application.Affected if The NMMediaServer.exe process is bound to a network-advertised port and accepting remote connections
The system is affected if Nero MediaHome version 2.5.5.0 or Nero MediaHome CE version 1.3.0.4 is installed AND the NMMediaServer.exe process is running and accessible over the network, allowing a remote attacker to send the crafted packet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf the product is still in use, verify if newer patched versions are available from Nero and update accordingly. Otherwise, implement network segmentation or firewall rules to restrict unauthorized access to the media server service.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-2322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-2322 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data