WabcmsApplication

CVE-2007-2944

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-05-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WabCMS 1.0 stores sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to download a database via a direct request for db/wabcmsn.mdb. NOTE: this issue was originally reported for "webCMS," but this was an error by an unreliable researcher.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WabCMS 1.0 stores its Microsoft Access database file (db/wabcmsn.mdb) within the web root directory without proper access controls, allowing any remote attacker to directly request and download the entire database containing sensitive application data.

MitigationRelocate the database file outside the web root directory and update the application's database connection path accordingly, or implement web server access controls (e.g., deny direct access to .mdb files via .htaccess or web.config).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WabcmsApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WabCMS 1.0 is installed
    Inspect your web root for WabCMS files such as index.php, admin.php, or typical WabCMS configuration files. Check application startup pages for 'WabCMS' branding or references.
    Affected if WabCMS version 1.0 is present on the server
  2. Confirm the database file path exists
    Locate the file named wabcmsn.mdb inside a 'db' subdirectory under your web root (e.g., /db/wabcmsn.mdb or /webroot/db/wabcmsn.mdb). Use file system inspection to verify this path exists.
    Affected if The file db/wabcmsn.mdb exists within the web-accessible directory tree
  3. Test direct HTTP access to the database file
    Using a web browser or curl command, attempt to retrieve the database file via HTTP: request http://yourdomain.com/db/wabcmsn.mdb (or the equivalent relative path). Check if the file downloads instead of being blocked.
    Affected if The database file is served as a downloadable attachment instead of returning a 403 Forbidden or 404 Not Found error
  4. Verify web server is not blocking .mdb file requests
    Check your web server configuration (.htaccess, web.config, or server config) for rules that explicitly deny access to .mdb files. Inspect if the web server returns a 403 response when requesting the database file directly.
    Affected if No access restrictions are configured and the file is directly accessible via HTTP

A user is affected if WabCMS 1.0 is installed and the db/wabcmsn.mdb file is present within the web root and accessible via a direct HTTP request without access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Relocate the database file outside the web root directory and update the application's database connection path accordingly, or implement web server access controls (e.g., deny direct access to .mdb files via .htaccess or web.config).

Fix this in Wabcms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-2944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-2944 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data