DiscoveryApplication · Centennial

CVE-2007-2950

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-07-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Centennial Discovery 2006 Feature Pack 1, which is used by (1) Numara Asset Manager 8.0 and (2) Symantec Discovery 6.5, uses insecure permissions on certain directories, which allows local users to gain privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Centennial Discovery 2006 Feature Pack 1 (used by Numara Asset Manager 8.0 and Symantec Discovery 6.5) contains insecure file system permissions on certain directories, allowing unprivileged local users to modify executable paths or inject malicious code and escalate to higher privileges.

MitigationRestrict permissions on vulnerable directories to prevent unauthorized user write access, or apply vendor patches if available. Verify that only trusted administrators can modify application directories and executable locations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DiscoveryApplication
Affected:= 2006_featurepack1
Asset ManagerApplication
Affected:= 8.0
DiscoveryApplication
Affected:= 6.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed product
    Check if Centennial Discovery 2006 Feature Pack 1, Numara Asset Manager 8.0, or Symantec Discovery 6.5 is installed on the system. Look in Add/Remove Programs (Windows) or check for the product in /opt or Program Files directories.
    Affected if Any of these three specific versions are installed on the system.
  2. Locate application installation directory
    Find the installation path for the identified product. Common locations include C:\Program Files\Centennial Discovery, C:\Program Files\Numara, or C:\Program Files\Symantec Discovery. Use registry keys or package management tools if available.
    Affected if The product is installed and the directory exists on the system.
  3. Check permissions on executable directories
    Review file system permissions on directories that contain executable files (.exe, .dll, .bat, .cmd) for the installed product. Use 'icacls' on Windows or 'ls -la' on Unix-like systems to list permissions.
    Affected if Non-administrative or unprivileged users have Write or Modify permissions on directories containing application executables.
  4. Verify executable path integrity
    Inspect configuration files, scripts, or registry entries that define executable paths for the application. Check if these paths point to locations writable by non-admin users.
    Affected if Executable paths can be modified by unprivileged users, or configuration files are writable by non-admin accounts.

The environment is affected if any of the three specific product versions are installed AND unprivileged users have write access to directories containing application executables or configuration files that define executable paths.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict permissions on vulnerable directories to prevent unauthorized user write access, or apply vendor patches if available. Verify that only trusted administrators can modify application directories and executable locations.

Fix this in Discovery Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,020
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-2950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-2950 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data