Online BankingApplication · W2b

CVE-2007-3175

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-06-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in W2B Online Banking allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the draft parameter to mailer.w2b or (2) the listDocPay parameter to DocPay.w2b.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

W2B Online Banking contains SQL injection vulnerabilities in two endpoints: mailer.w2b (draft parameter) and DocPay.w2b (listDocPay parameter). Remote attackers can inject arbitrary SQL commands through these parameters, potentially allowing complete database compromise including exposure of sensitive banking data, customer information, and financial records.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions. Apply input validation and sanitization on all user-controlled parameters. Deploy a WAF as an interim protective measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Online BankingApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm W2B Online Banking is deployed
    Identify whether the W2B Online Banking application is installed or hosted in your environment. Check web server logs, application inventories, or directory listings for references to 'w2b' or 'W2B' in application paths.
    Affected if W2B Online Banking software is present in the environment.
  2. Verify mailer.w2b endpoint exists
    Attempt to access the mailer.w2b endpoint in your web application (e.g., https://yourbankingsite.com/mailer.w2b or similar path). Look for HTTP responses that indicate the endpoint exists rather than returning 404.
    Affected if The mailer.w2b endpoint is accessible and responds without a 404 error.
  3. Verify DocPay.w2b endpoint exists
    Attempt to access the DocPay.w2b endpoint in your web application (e.g., https://yourbankingsite.com/DocPay.w2b or similar path). Check for successful HTTP responses indicating the endpoint is active.
    Affected if The DocPay.w2b endpoint is accessible and responds without a 404 error.
  4. Inspect parameter handling in mailer.w2b
    If mailer.w2b exists, submit a test request including the 'draft' parameter with a non-SQL value. Review application source code if accessible, or observe database logs to determine whether the parameter is passed directly to SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization.
    Affected if The draft parameter is used in raw SQL queries without parameterized binding or input validation.
  5. Inspect parameter handling in DocPay.w2b
    If DocPay.w2b exists, submit a test request including the 'listDocPay' parameter. Examine the application code or database query logs to verify whether this parameter is passed directly to SQL without prepared statements or sanitization.
    Affected if The listDocPay parameter is used in raw SQL queries without parameterized binding or input validation.

Your environment is affected if W2B Online Banking is deployed and either the mailer.w2b or DocPay.w2b endpoints accept the draft or listDocPay parameters respectively without using parameterized queries or input validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions. Apply input validation and sanitization on all user-controlled parameters. Deploy a WAF as an interim protective measure.

Fix this in Online Banking Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3175 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data