CVE-2007-3300
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple F-Secure anti-virus products for Microsoft Windows and Linux before 20070619 allow remote attackers to bypass scanning via a crafted header in a (1) LHA or (2) RAR archive.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceF-Secure anti-virus products for Windows and Linux versions before June 19, 2007 contain a vulnerability where specially crafted headers in LHA or RAR archive files can bypass the antivirus scanning engine, allowing malicious payloads to be delivered without detection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.16= 4.51= 4.52= 4.61= 4.64= 4.65= 5.0.2= 5.2.1= 5.3.0= 5.5= 5.40= 5.41<= 5.52<= 5.52= 2005= 2006= 2007<= 6.61= 2.06= 2.14= 2.15.484= 2.16= 6.20CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed F-Secure productsOn Windows, check Add/Remove Programs or the Program Files folder for F-Secure entries. On Linux, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i fsecure' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i fsecure' to list installed F-Secure packages.Affected if Any F-Secure product from the affected product list is installed
-
Check F-Secure Anti-Virus Windows versionOpen the F-Secure Anti-Virus GUI and navigate to About or Settings > Support to view the version number. Alternatively, check the Windows registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Data Fellows\F-Secure\Antivirus or look at the executable version properties of the avp.exe or f-secure.exe process.Affected if The version equals 2.16, 4.51, 4.52, 4.61, 4.64, 4.65, 5.0.2, 5.2.1, 5.3.0, 5.5, 5.40, or 5.41
-
Check F-Secure Anti-Virus Linux versionRun 'f-secure --version' or check the RPM/DEB package version using 'rpm -q f-secure-anti-virus' or 'dpkg -l f-secure-anti-virus'. Look in /opt/f-secure for installation directories.Affected if The version is 5.52 or lower (any version up to and including 5.52)
-
Check F-Secure Internet Security versionOpen the F-Secure Internet Security GUI and check About or Support information. On Windows, also check Add/Remove Programs for the installed version.Affected if The version equals 2005, 2006, or 2007
-
Check F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper versionCheck the installed version through the product interface, or run 'fsgate --version' if available. On Linux, check the RPM/DEB package.Affected if The version is 6.61 or lower, or equals 2.06, 2.14, 2.15.484, or 2.16
A user is affected if any F-Secure product from the list is installed and its version matches one of the vulnerable versions specified.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate F-Secure anti-virus products to versions released after June 19, 2007 to patch the scanning bypass vulnerability.
Any version released after 20070619 (the specific fixed release version should be obtained from F-Secure's official download page)
- 1. Identify the currently installed F-Secure product and exact version from the affected list
- 2. Visit the official F-Secure support portal at www.f-secure.com to obtain the latest version released after June 2007
- 3. Download the appropriate update for your specific F-Secure product (Anti Virus, Internet Security, or Internet Gatekeeper)
- 4. Apply the update following F-Secure's standard update procedure
- 5. Verify the scanning engine date is post-June 2007 to confirm the vulnerability is addressed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3300 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3300 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data