Sip SoftphoneApplication · Nortel

CVE-2007-3438

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-06-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in the SIP header parsing module in the Nortel PC Client SIP Soft Phone 4.1 3.5.208[20051015] allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed message, a different vulnerability than CVE-2007-3361.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in the SIP header parsing module of Nortel PC Client SIP Soft Phone 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted malformed SIP message. The overflow occurs during parsing of SIP headers, enabling an attacker to overwrite memory and potentially gain control of the affected system.

MitigationIf the affected software is still in use, immediately apply any available vendor patches or migrate to a supported SIP soft phone solution. Network-based filtering of SIP traffic can provide a temporary compensating control, but does not address the underlying vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sip SoftphoneApplication
Affected:= 4.13.5.208

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Nortel Sip Softphone installation
    Check for the presence of Nortel Sip Softphone in the system program files or application directory. On Windows, check Registry keys under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Nortel or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Nortel, or look for executable files named 'SipSoftphone.exe' or similar in Program Files.
    Affected if Nortel Sip Softphone software is found on the system
  2. Confirm installed version matches affected release
    Right-click the application executable, select Properties, then check the Version tab. Alternatively, check the version information in the Windows Registry or run 'msiexec /x{ProductCode}' to query installer details.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.13.5.208
  3. Verify SIP protocol functionality is active
    Check if the application is configured to receive SIP connections. Look for SIP port listening status using 'netstat -an | findstr :5060' or check the application's configuration for enabled SIP accounts or profiles.
    Affected if The SIP softphone has an active SIP account or profile configured and is running
  4. Confirm application is running and exposed to network
    Use Task Manager to verify the Sip Softphone process is running, and run 'netstat -ano' to confirm the application is listening on UDP/TCP port 5060 or other SIP ports.
    Affected if The application process is running and bound to a network interface listening for SIP traffic

A system is affected only if Nortel Sip Softphone version 4.13.5.208 is installed, the SIP functionality is configured and enabled, and the application is running and exposed to incoming SIP messages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

If the affected software is still in use, immediately apply any available vendor patches or migrate to a supported SIP soft phone solution. Network-based filtering of SIP traffic can provide a temporary compensating control, but does not address the underlying vulnerability.

Fix this in Sip Softphone Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3438 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data