CVE-2007-3847
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe date handling code in modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (mod_proxy) in Apache 2.3.0, when using a threaded MPM, allows remote origin servers to cause a denial of service (caching forward proxy process crash) via crafted date headers that trigger a buffer over-read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer over-read vulnerability in Apache mod_proxy's date handling code (modules/proxy/proxy_util.c) in version 2.3.0 when using a threaded MPM. Remote origin servers can send crafted date headers that trigger the buffer over-read, causing the caching forward proxy process to crash, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.35, < 2.0.61>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.6= 7= 6.06= 6.10= 7.04= 7.10= 6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache versionRun 'apache2 -v' or 'httpd -v' to determine the installed Apache versionAffected if Version is 2.0.35 through 2.0.60, or 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 (vulnerable versions)
-
Verify mod_proxy is loadedRun 'apache2 -M' or 'httpd -M' and grep for 'proxy_module', or check for 'LoadModule proxy_module' in the configuration filesAffected if mod_proxy module is loaded and active
-
Identify the MPM in useRun 'apache2 -M' or 'httpd -M' and look for 'mpm_worker' or 'mpm_event' (threaded MPMs), or check the configuration for 'Threaded' or the MPM directiveAffected if Using a threaded MPM (worker or event) rather than prefork
-
Confirm proxy caching or forward proxy is configuredSearch configuration files (httpd.conf, apache2.conf, included .conf files) for directives such as 'ProxyRequests On', 'ProxyPass', 'CacheEnable', or 'ProxyRemote' that enable proxy functionalityAffected if A caching forward proxy configuration is active using mod_proxy
You are affected if you are running a vulnerable Apache version (2.0.35-2.0.60 or 2.2.0-2.2.5) with mod_proxy loaded, using a threaded MPM, and have a caching or forward proxy configuration in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.0.612.2.6
Upgrade to a patched Apache version that addresses this vulnerability. If mod_proxy is not required, consider disabling it. Ensure threaded MPM configurations are reviewed alongside the patch deployment.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- httpd.apache.org
- httpd.apache.org
- bugs.gentoo.org
- lists.vmware.com
- marc.info
- marc.info
- marc.info
- security.gentoo.org
- slackware.com
- support.avaya.com
- www-1.ibm.com
- www-1.ibm.com
- www-1.ibm.com
- www.fujitsu.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.apple.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- docs.info.apple.com
- h20000.www2.hp.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.novell.com
- issues.rpath.com
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3847 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data