CVE-2007-3922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) Applet Class Loader in Sun JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 11 and earlier, 6 through 6 Update 1, and SDK and JRE 1.4.2_14 and earlier, allows remote attackers to violate the security model for an applet's outbound connections by connecting to certain localhost services running on the machine that loaded the applet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a flaw in the JRE Applet Class Loader that allows malicious applets to bypass the applet sandbox security restrictions and connect to localhost services running on the user's machine. Normally, applets are restricted to only making network connections to the host they were loaded from, but this vulnerability enables them to reach local services, potentially facilitating attacks against local infrastructure or exposing sensitive local data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.5.0<= 1.6.0<= 1.5.0<= 1.6.0<= 1.4.2_14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Java versionRun 'java -version' from command line to obtain the JRE/JDK version stringAffected if Version shows 1.4.2_x where x is 14 or lower, OR 1.5.0_x where x is 12 or lower, OR 1.6.0_x where x is 2 or lower, indicating the installed version falls within the affected ranges (JDK/JRE <=1.4.2_14, <=1.5.0, <=1.6.0)
-
Identify Java browser plugin presenceCheck common browser plugin locations: on Windows check C:\Program Files\Java\jre*\bin\np*.dll or on Unix check ~/.mozilla/plugins/ for libnp*.so files; alternatively, in Firefox navigate to about:plugins and look for Java Applet Plug-inAffected if A Java Applet Plug-in is listed in the browser plugins, indicating the Java browser integration is installed and could execute malicious applets
-
Verify applet execution capabilityIf Java is installed, attempt to verify the plugin status by checking browser settings or the Java Control Panel (Java Plug-in tab) to see if the browser plugin is enabledAffected if The Java browser plugin is enabled or set to allow applets to run in browsers, meaning the vulnerability can be triggered by visiting a malicious webpage with an embedded applet
A user is affected if their environment has a Java version in the affected ranges (1.4.2_14 and below, 1.5.0 up to update 12, or 1.6.0 up to update 2) AND the Java browser plugin is installed and enabled, allowing untrusted applets to execute and potentially reach localhost services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Java to a version beyond the affected releases (JDK/JRE 5.0 Update 12+, 6 Update 2+, or 1.4.2_15+). As a compensating control, disable Java browser plug-ins or use click-to-play settings to prevent untrusted applets from executing.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-3922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- dev2dev.bea.com
- docs.info.apple.com
- h20000.www2.hp.com
- lists.apple.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- slackware.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.gentoo.org
- www.novell.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-3922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data