CVE-2007-4467
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple stack-based buffer overflows in the Oracle JInitiator ActiveX control (beans.ocx) 1.1.8.16 and earlier, as used by Oracle Forms applications from Oracle and third parties, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified "initialization parameters." NOTE: it was later reported that 1.1.8.3 through 1.1.8.25, and probably 1.1.5.x and 1.1.7.x, are affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple stack-based buffer overflows in the Oracle JInitiator ActiveX control (beans.ocx) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted initialization parameters. The vulnerability affects versions 1.1.8.25 and earlier, including 1.1.5.x and 1.1.7.x branches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1.5= 1.1.7= 1.1.8.3= 1.1.8.16= 1.1.8.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the JInitiator ActiveX control fileSearch for beans.ocx on the system. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Oracle\JInitiator\bin\beans.ocx or C:\oracle\product\...\JInitiator\bin\beans.ocx. Use Windows Explorer search or command: dir /s C:\beans.ocxAffected if The file beans.ocx exists on the system, indicating JInitiator is installed
-
Identify the installed JInitiator versionRight-click beans.ocx, select Properties, then go to the Version tab to see the File Version. Alternatively, check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Oracle\JInitiator or look in the JInitiator installation directory for a version fileAffected if The version is 1.1.8.25 or earlier, including any 1.1.5.x, 1.1.7.x, or 1.1.8.x release (such as 1.1.8.3 or 1.1.8.16)
-
Verify the ActiveX control is registeredOpen Command Prompt and run: regsvr32 /s beans.ocx (to register) or check registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\ for entries containing JInitiator or beans. The control is vulnerable when registered and available to Internet ExplorerAffected if The ActiveX control is registered and enabled in Windows, making it loadable by Internet Explorer
-
Check if Internet Explorer has the control enabledOpen Internet Explorer, go to Tools > Internet Options > Security > Custom Level > ActiveX controls and plugins. Look for settings related to Oracle JInitiator or beans.ocx. Also check via Group Policy if managedAffected if The ActiveX control is allowed to run in Internet Explorer security zones, particularly the Intranet or Internet zones
The system is affected if Oracle JInitiator with beans.ocx version 1.1.8.25 or earlier is installed and the ActiveX control is registered and enabled for use in Internet Explorer.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace or remove the vulnerable JInitiator ActiveX control and migrate Oracle Forms applications to supported alternatives (Oracle Forms 11g/12c with Java Web Start or newer deployment models). If immediate removal is not feasible, disable the ActiveX control through Internet Explorer security settings or group policy.
Migrate to Oracle Forms with Sun Java Plug-in / Oracle Java Plug-in (the successor to JInitiator)
- Oracle JInitiator was deprecated and reached end of life. There is no supported upgrade path within JInitiator itself.
- Migrate from Oracle JInitiator to the Sun Java Plug-in (later Oracle Java Plug-in) for running Oracle Forms applications.
- Identify all Oracle Forms applications that rely on JInitiator and retest them with the Sun/Oracle Java Plug-in.
- Update client workstations to use a supported JVM and configure Oracle Forms to use the native Java Plug-in instead of JInitiator.
- If migration is not immediately feasible, disable the JInitiator ActiveX control (beans.ocx) in Internet Explorer via the Windows registry or group policy to prevent exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-4467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-4467 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data