WebbatchApplication · Wilson Windowware

CVE-2007-5011

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-09-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2007c or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
webbatch.exe in WebBatch allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via the dumpinputdata parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The webbatch.exe component in WebBatch contains an information disclosure vulnerability where the 'dumpinputdata' parameter, when supplied in an HTTP request, causes the application to dump sensitive information to the attacker. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to potentially access configuration data, session information, or other internal application data.

MitigationApply vendor patches if available, or disable/remove the dumpinputdata functionality in webbatch.exe. If the product is obsolete or unpatched, consider upgrading to a supported version or removing the affected component from production.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WebbatchApplication
Affected:<= 2007c

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WebBatch installation and version
    Locate webbatch.exe on the system and check its version properties (right-click > Properties > Version tab) or check the program's About/Version info. Compare against affected version 2007c or earlier.
    Affected if The installed version is WebBatch 2007c or any version prior to it.
  2. Confirm webbatch.exe is web-exposed
    Check if webbatch.exe is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS from external sources. This typically involves reviewing web server configurations (IIS, Apache, etc.) or checking if the application is listening on any network interface.
    Affected if webbatch.exe is deployed on a web server and reachable via HTTP/HTTPS requests.
  3. Test dumpinputdata parameter behavior
    Send a crafted HTTP request to webbatch.exe with the 'dumpinputdata' parameter appended (e.g., http://target/webbatch.exe?dumpinputdata=1 or similar). Observe if sensitive data is returned in the response.
    Affected if The application returns configuration data, session information, or other internal application data in response to the dumpinputdata parameter.
  4. Review web server logs for dumpinputdata usage
    Examine web server access logs (IIS logs, Apache access logs) for any requests containing 'dumpinputdata' parameter. Search for patterns like 'dumpinputdata' in query strings.
    Affected if Historical or current log entries show requests with the dumpinputdata parameter, indicating potential exploitation or probing.

A system is affected if WebBatch version 2007c or earlier is installed, webbatch.exe is web-accessible, and the dumpinputdata parameter reveals sensitive information when requested.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2007c
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patches if available, or disable/remove the dumpinputdata functionality in webbatch.exe. If the product is obsolete or unpatched, consider upgrading to a supported version or removing the affected component from production.

Fix this in Webbatch Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5011 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data