CVE-2007-5389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in preview.php in the swMenuFree (com_swmenufree) 4.6 component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter. NOTE: a reliable third party disputes this issue because preview.php tests a certain constant to prevent direct requests
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRemote file inclusion vulnerability in Joomla swMenuFree 4.6 component's preview.php allows code execution via the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter. However, the vulnerability is disputed by a third party who claims preview.php includes a constant check to prevent direct requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm swMenuFree component installationLook for the swMenuFree component directory in the Joomla installation, typically at /components/com_swmenufree/ or /administrator/components/com_swmenufree/Affected if The swMenuFree 4.6 component directory exists in the Joomla components folder
-
Verify swMenuFree versionCheck the component's manifest XML file (typically swmenufree.xml in the component directory) or the Joomla extension manager for the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is swMenuFree 4.6 specifically
-
Locate vulnerable preview.php fileCheck for the presence of preview.php within the swMenuFree component directory (e.g., /components/com_swmenufree/preview.php)Affected if The preview.php file exists in the swMenuFree component directory
-
Inspect constant check in preview.phpOpen preview.php and search for a constant definition check such as 'defined(_VALID_MOS)' or 'defined("_VALID_MOS")' at the beginning of the fileAffected if The constant check is missing, allowing direct access, OR the check exists but is improperly implemented (e.g., using 'or die()' without halting execution)
-
Verify component is enabledCheck Joomla's extension manager or database #__extensions table to confirm the swMenuFree component is enabled and publishedAffected if The component is enabled and accessible on the frontend
You are affected if swMenuFree version 4.6 is installed with preview.php accessible and the constant check in preview.php is missing or improperly implemented.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataVerify whether the constant check in preview.php properly prevents exploitation; if not, upgrade swMenuFree to a patched version or disable/remove the component.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data