Etrust Integrated Threat ManagementApplication · Broadcom

CVE-2007-5439

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-10-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
CA (formerly Computer Associates) eTrust ITM (Threat Manager) 8.1 stores sensitive user information in log files with predictable names, which allows remote attackers to obtain this information via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CA eTrust ITM (Threat Manager) 8.1 stores sensitive user information (likely authentication credentials or session data) in log files with predictable names. This allows remote attackers to potentially obtain this information by accessing these log files through guessable file paths, leading to credential disclosure or privilege escalation.

MitigationRestrict file system permissions on log directories to prevent unauthorized access, implement log file rotation with sanitization of sensitive data, and ensure logs are stored outside web-accessible paths. Consider implementing Web Application Firewall rules to block access to log file extensions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Etrust Integrated Threat ManagementApplication
Affected:= 8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify CA eTrust ITM version
    Check the installed version of CA eTrust ITM (Threat Manager) or Broadcom Etrust Integrated Threat Management by reviewing installed programs, registry keys (HKLM\Software\ComputerAssociates\eTrustITM), or the application binary version information.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 8.1
  2. Locate log file directories
    Identify where the application stores its log files by examining the application configuration, registry settings under HKLM\Software\ComputerAssociates\eTrustITM\, or common default paths such as C:\Program Files\CA\eTrust ITM\, C:\Program Files\CA\eTrust Threat Manager\, or within the installation directory under a Logs or Logfiles subfolder.
    Affected if Log directories exist and contain application log files
  3. Check log file naming patterns
    Examine the log file names for predictability - look for files with sequential, date-based, or incrementing names (such as log1.txt, log2.txt, or logs with sequential numbers).
    Affected if Log files use predictable sequential or incrementing names that could be guessed
  4. Inspect log file contents for sensitive data
    Open and review the contents of log files in the identified log directory, searching for stored credentials, session tokens, password strings, or authentication-related data.
    Affected if Log files contain plain-text credentials, session tokens, or other sensitive authentication information
  5. Verify log directory permissions
    Check file system permissions on the log directory using icacls or file explorer security properties to determine if unauthorized users or remote attackers could read the log files.
    Affected if Log directory grants read access to non-admin users or is accessible over the network without authentication

A user is affected if they have CA eTrust ITM version 8.1 installed AND log files with predictable names are readable by unauthorized users, enabling credential disclosure.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict file system permissions on log directories to prevent unauthorized access, implement log file rotation with sanitization of sensitive data, and ensure logs are stored outside web-accessible paths. Consider implementing Web Application Firewall rules to block access to log file extensions.

Fix this in Etrust Integrated Threat Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5439 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5439 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data