CVE-2007-5580
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in a certain driver in Cisco Security Agent 4.5.1 before 4.5.1.672, 5.0 before 5.0.0.225, 5.1 before 5.1.0.106, and 5.2 before 5.2.0.238 on Windows allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted SMB packet in a TCP session on port (1) 139 or (2) 445.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the SMB packet parsing driver of Cisco Security Agent versions 4.5.1 before 4.5.1.672, 5.0 before 5.0.0.225, 5.1 before 5.1.0.106, and 5.2 before 5.2.0.238 on Windows. Remote attackers can send crafted SMB packets on ports 139 or 445 to trigger the overflow and execute arbitrary code with kernel-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1= 3= 4.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.0.3.728= 4.5= 4.5.1= 4.5.1.639= 4.5.1.657= 4.5.1.659CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco Security Agent versionUse system inventory tools, registry queries, or the Cisco agent management console to retrieve the installed version of Cisco Security Agent. Common locations include Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Cisco\Security Agent or the agent's own status interface.Affected if The installed version is 4.5.1.639, 4.5.1.657, 4.5.1.659, or any 5.0.x, 5.1.x, or 5.2.x version below the fixed releases (5.0.0.225, 5.1.0.106, 5.2.0.238).
-
Verify SMB service exposureScan network listening ports on the local system to determine if ports 139 or 445 are open and listening. Use commands such as netstat -an or port scanning tools to check for SMB service availability.Affected if Ports 139 or 445 are open and reachable, allowing external SMB packet delivery to the vulnerable driver.
-
Confirm SMB packet parsing driver is activeCheck the Cisco Security Agent driver status for the SMB parsing module. This can be verified through the agent's system service information or driver enumeration utilities.Affected if The SMB packet parsing driver is loaded and processing SMB traffic on the affected system.
A system is affected if it runs any vulnerable Cisco Security Agent version (4.5.1.639, 4.5.1.657, 4.5.1.659, or unpatched 5.0/5.1/5.2) AND has SMB ports 139/445 exposed, allowing remote attackers to send crafted packets to trigger the buffer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches to upgrade to fixed versions (4.5.1.672, 5.0.0.225, 5.1.0.106, or 5.2.0.238 or later). As an interim control, block or filter SMB traffic (ports 139/445) at network perimeters to prevent remote exploitation.
Cisco Security Agent 5.2.0.238 or later (or the equivalent patched version for your current branch: 4.5.1.672, 5.0.0.225, or 5.1.0.106)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Cisco Security Agent version by checking the program files directory or using system inventory tools
- 2. Determine which version branch is currently in use (4.5.1, 5.0, 5.1, or 5.2)
- 3. For version 4.5.1: Upgrade to version 4.5.1.672 or later
- 4. For version 5.0: Upgrade to version 5.0.0.225 or later
- 5. For version 5.1: Upgrade to version 5.1.0.106 or later
- 6. For version 5.2: Upgrade to version 5.2.0.238 or later
- 7. If running versions 2.1, 3, 4.0, or 4.0.1 mentioned in the affected products list, note these are older branches; consider upgrading to one of the supported version branches (5.x series) and applying the appropriate patch level
- 8. After upgrade, verify the agent is running and protecting the system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-5580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-5580 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data