Ingate FirewallHardware / appliance · Ingate

CVE-2007-6096

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-11-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.5.2 or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Ingate Firewall before 4.6.0 and SIParator before 4.6.0 use cleartext storage for passwords of "administrators with less privileges," which might allow attackers to read these passwords via unknown vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Ingate Firewall and SIParator before version 4.6.0 store passwords for lower-privilege administrators in cleartext, allowing attackers to read these passwords through unknown vectors. This is an information disclosure vulnerability involving improper credential storage.

MitigationUpgrade Ingate Firewall and SIParator to version 4.6.0 or later to obtain the fix for cleartext password storage. Verify all administrative accounts use properly hashed passwords after the upgrade.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ingate FirewallHardware / appliance
Affected:<= 4.5.2
Ingate SiparatorHardware / appliance
Affected:<= 4.5.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product and version
    Access the Ingate Firewall or SIParator administrative interface or CLI and retrieve the system version information. This is typically found in System > Status, System > Information, or via command line with a version or show version command.
    Affected if The product is Ingate Firewall or SIParator and the version is 4.5.2 or earlier (any version up to and including 4.5.2).
  2. Locate administrator account configuration
    Navigate to the administrative user management section of the product interface (typically under User Management, Administrators, or Accounts in the web UI). Review the configuration for any administrative or limited-privilege user accounts.
    Affected if Administrative accounts exist in the system configuration, particularly lower-privilege administrator accounts.
  3. Inspect password storage mechanism
    If you have access to the underlying file system, backup configuration, or database where user credentials are stored, examine how passwords are stored for the administrator accounts. Look for any configuration files, user database files, or backup files that may contain credential data.
    Affected if Passwords for any administrator accounts (especially lower-privilege admins) are stored in cleartext rather than being hashed or encrypted.
  4. Check for configuration backup files
    Locate any configuration backup files, export files, or system dumps that may contain user account information. These are sometimes stored in the /config, /backup, or similar directories on the appliance.
    Affected if A backup or export file contains cleartext passwords for user accounts.

Your environment is affected if you are running Ingate Firewall or SIParator version 4.5.2 or earlier and you have administrative accounts configured, as the cleartext password storage vulnerability applies to all such installations within this version range.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.5.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Ingate Firewall and SIParator to version 4.6.0 or later to obtain the fix for cleartext password storage. Verify all administrative accounts use properly hashed passwords after the upgrade.

Fix this in Ingate Firewall Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-6096 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-6096 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data