Case ManagerApplication · Vu

CVE-2007-6168

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2007-11-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in default.asp in VU Case Manager allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the username parameter, a different vector than CVE-2007-6143. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in the default.asp page of VU Case Manager where the username parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. This could enable unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or potential authentication bypass.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the username parameter and all user inputs to prevent SQL injection. Apply input validation and use least-privilege database accounts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Case ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate VU Case Manager application
    Search the web server filesystem for default.asp files and examine the application directory structure. Check web server configuration (IIS, Apache) for applications named 'VU Case Manager', 'VuCaseManager', or similar. Look for directories containing 'case', 'manager', or 'vu' in the path.
    Affected if VU Case Manager application is present on the server
  2. Identify vulnerable default.asp file
    Examine default.asp files found in the application for SQL query handling. Look for code that processes a 'username' request parameter. Search for SQL SELECT statements that include the username variable directly in the query string.
    Affected if default.asp contains SQL queries that incorporate the username parameter without sanitization
  3. Check for parameterized query usage
    Review the default.asp source code to determine if the username parameter is used in SQL statements via parameterized queries (ADODB.Command with parameters, stored procedures) or via direct string concatenation (e.g., "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='" & request("username") & "'").
    Affected if The username parameter is used in SQL queries through direct string concatenation rather than parameterized queries
  4. Verify application is accessible over network
    Confirm the default.asp page is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS to external or internal users. Check web server access logs for requests to default.asp with a username parameter.
    Affected if The vulnerable default.asp page is reachable via web requests

The environment is affected if VU Case Manager is deployed and the username parameter in default.asp uses direct SQL string concatenation without parameterized queries, making it accessible to attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the username parameter and all user inputs to prevent SQL injection. Apply input validation and use least-privilege database accounts.

Fix this in Case Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-6168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-6168 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data