CVE-2007-6594
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Lotus Notes 8 for Linux before 8.0.1 uses (1) unspecified weak permissions for the installation kit obtained through a Notes 8 download and (2) 0777 permissions for the installdata file that is created by setup.sh, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Lotus Notes 8 for Linux before 8.0.1 has improper file permissions: unspecified weak permissions on the installation kit and overly permissive 0777 permissions on the installdata file created by setup.sh. This allows local unprivileged users to replace files with Trojan horse executables, potentially gaining elevated privileges upon execution by the installation process or other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine IBM Lotus Notes version on LinuxRun 'ls -la' on the Lotus Notes installation directory (commonly /opt/ibm/lotus or /opt/lotus) and look for a version file, or run 'notes' binary with --version flag if available. Alternatively, check RPM/DEB package version with 'rpm -q lotus-notes' or 'dpkg -l lotus-notes' if installed via package manager.Affected if Installed version is 8.0.1 or earlier (versions before 8.0.1)
-
Locate the Lotus Notes installation kitSearch for installation kit files in the system: look for files named 'setup.sh', installation tarballs, or disk images in common locations like /tmp, the user's home directory, or the original installation source directory. Use 'find / -name setup.sh 2>/dev/null' or 'find / -name *Lotus*Notes* 2>/dev/null' to locate these files.Affected if Installation kit files exist and have permissions weaker than 755 (such as 777 or world-writable)
-
Identify the installdata file created by setup.shIn the Lotus Notes installation directory, search for a file named 'installdata' or similar. Use 'find /opt/ibm/lotus -name "*installdata*" -o -name "*install*data*" 2>/dev/null'. Check the directory where setup.sh was executed if installation was performed.Affected if An installdata file exists with 0777 permissions (rwxrwxrwx)
-
Verify permissions on Lotus Notes installation directory contentsRun 'ls -la' on the main Lotus Notes installation directory (/opt/ibm/lotus or /opt/lotus) and examine permission strings. Look for any files or directories with world-writable permissions (the third octet is 7, e.g., -rwxrwxrwx).Affected if Any executable or configuration files under the installation directory have 0777 permissions, allowing unprivileged users to modify them
A system is affected if IBM Lotus Notes 8.x for Linux is installed at version 8.0.1 or earlier AND either the installation kit files have weak permissions or the installdata file (or any other executable under the install path) has 0777 permissions, allowing unprivileged users to replace them with malicious code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to IBM Lotus Notes 8.0.1 or later. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, manually identify and correct the 0777 permissions on the installdata file and ensure the installation kit has restrictive permissions (e.g., 755 or stricter) to prevent unauthorized modification.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2007-6594 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2007-6594 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data