Radius ServerOperating system · Radiator

CVE-2008-0330

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-01-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.17.1 or later.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Open System Consultants (OSC) Radiator before 4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via malformed RADIUS requests, as demonstrated by packets sent by nmap.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Open System Consultants Radiator RADIUS server versions before 4.0 contain a vulnerability in packet handling that allows remote attackers to send malformed RADIUS requests (such as those generated by nmap) and cause the daemon to crash, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade to Radiator version 4.0 or later to obtain the fix for malformed packet handling. Additionally, consider network segmentation and firewall rules to limit RADIUS access to trusted authentication servers only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Radius ServerOperating system
Affected:<= 3.17.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Radiator RADIUS server is installed
    Check for Radiator installation directories (typically /usr/local/radiator, /opt/radiator, or the perl Radiator distribution), or search for radiator.exe, Radiator.cfg, or similar Radiator-specific files on the system. Also check running processes for 'radiator' or 'radiusd' processes.
    Affected if Radiator RADIUS server software is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed Radiator version
    Run 'perl -MRadiator -e "print $Radiator::VERSION"' if Radiator perl modules are installed, or check the version string in the Radiator installation directory files, release notes, or the software inventory if managed by a package manager.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.17.1 or any version lower than 3.17.1 (versions before 4.0 are affected)
  3. Confirm the RADIUS service is running
    Check if the Radiator daemon is actively running using process listing commands (ps aux | grep radiator, tasklist on Windows, or systemctl status radiator) and verify it is listening on RADIUS ports 1645/1812 (authentication) and optionally 1646/1813 (accounting).
    Affected if The Radiator RADIUS service is running and actively listening for RADIUS requests
  4. Assess network exposure of RADIUS ports
    Verify that UDP ports 1645/1812 (and 1646/1813 if accounting is enabled) are accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, listening sockets (netstat -ulnp | grep -E '1645|1812'), or performing a port scan from an external perspective.
    Affected if RADIUS ports are exposed to network segments that contain untrusted or attacker-accessible systems, enabling remote malformed packet delivery

You are affected if Radiator RADIUS server version 3.17.1 or lower is installed and the RADIUS service is running with accessible network ports, allowing remote attackers to send malformed packets that can crash the daemon.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.17.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Radiator version 4.0 or later to obtain the fix for malformed packet handling. Additionally, consider network segmentation and firewall rules to limit RADIUS access to trusted authentication servers only.

Fix this in Radius Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0330 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data