CVE-2008-0344
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB07.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Spatial component affecting Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3. The vulnerability has unknown impact but is remotely exploitable (CVSS 10). Oracle Spatial provides spatial data management and location-based services within the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.2.2= 9.0.4.3= 10.1.2.0.2= 10.1.2.1.0= 10.1.2.2.0= 10.1.3.0.0= 10.1.3.1.0= 10.1.3.3.0= 10.1.2= 9.0.1.5= 9.2.0.8= 9.2.0.8dv= 10.1.0.5= 10.2.0.2= 10.2.0.3= 11.1.0.6= 11.5.9= 11.5.10= 11.5.10.2= 12.0.0= 12.0.1= 12.0.2= 12.0.3= 8.47= 8.48= 8.49CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Oracle Spatial component is installedQuery the database for Spatial components: SELECT comp_name, version, status FROM dba_registry WHERE comp_name LIKE '%Spatial%'; or check for MDSYS schema existence: SELECT username FROM dba_users WHERE username = 'MDSYS';Affected if Oracle Spatial is installed and the version matches one of the affected versions listed in the CVE (9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8dv, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.3, 11.1.0.6 for Database Server)
-
Check Oracle Database server versionConnect as SYSDBA and run: SELECT version FROM v$instance; or SELECT * FROM v$version; to obtain the full version stringAffected if The version output matches any of the affected Database Server versions: 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8dv, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.2, 10.2.0.3, or 11.1.0.6
-
Check Oracle Application Server versionLocate the Oracle Home directory and check the version file: cat $ORACLE_HOME/oraInventory/ContentsXML/oraclehomeproperties.xml or check the OPatch inventory: $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch lsinventoryAffected if The Application Server version matches any of the affected versions: 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, 10.1.2.1.0, 10.1.2.2.0, 10.1.3.0.0, 10.1.3.1.0, or 10.1.3.3.0
-
Verify Spatial features are in useCheck for spatial indexes or spatial data: SELECT index_name FROM dba_indexes WHERE index_type = 'DOMAIN' AND ext_idx_usr = 'MDSYS'; or query USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA for spatial layersAffected if Spatial indexes or spatial metadata exist, indicating the Oracle Spatial feature is actively used in the database
The environment is affected if Oracle Spatial component is installed and the Oracle product version matches any of the specific versions listed in the affected products (9.0.1.5 through 11.1.0.6 for Database, or the Application Server versions, etc.), and the system is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for January 2008 or later. For systems on unsupported Oracle 10g versions, upgrade to a supported database version and apply latest CPU.
Oracle Database 10.2.0.4+ or 11g release; Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2008 or later
- Apply the Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for January 2008 or later, which addresses CVE-2008-0344 (Oracle Spatial DB07)
- For Oracle Database 10.1.0.5, apply Oracle patch set 10.1.0.6 or later
- For Oracle Database 10.2.0.3, apply Oracle patch set 10.2.0.4 or later
- Verify the patch was applied successfully by checking the Oracle inventory: opatch lsinventory
- Confirm the fix by reviewing the Oracle Critical Patch Update advisory for January 2008 at www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2008-48616.html
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,576.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0344 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data