CVE-2008-0524
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface in multiple Yamaha RT series routers allows remote attackers to change password settings and probably other configuration settings as administrators via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management interface of Yamaha RT series routers allows remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly submitting malicious requests that change password settings and other configuration parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label, startup output, or management interface to confirm the exact model number (RT107e, RT52pro, RT56v, RT57i, RT58i, RT60w, RT80i, or RTA50i).Affected if The model matches one of the affected Yamaha RT series routers listed in the CVE.
-
Confirm web management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the router's web-based management interface using its LAN or WAN IP address in a browser.Affected if The management interface is reachable and responds, meaning an attacker could potentially craft a malicious page to target an authenticated administrator.
-
Verify CSRF protection is absentReview the router's HTML forms (login, password change, configuration) for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens or unique request identifiers. Check if the interface relies solely on session cookies without validating request origin.Affected if The interface lacks anti-CSRF tokens or referer validation, allowing attackers to forge authenticated requests.
-
Check if administrative access is not restrictedDetermine whether the management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or allows remote administration without IP-based access controls.Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks without additional access restrictions.
The environment is affected if a Yamaha RT series router model listed in the CVE has its web management interface accessible without proper CSRF protections in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware updates for affected Yamaha RT series router models. If no update is available, implement additional CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens and proper referer validation on the management interface, and limit administrative access to trusted networks.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0524 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0524 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data