LsrunaseApplication · Moernaut

CVE-2008-0581

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-02-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Geert Moernaut LSrunasE allows local users to gain privileges by obtaining the encrypted password from a batch file, and constructing a modified batch file that specifies this password in the /password switch and specifies an arbitrary program in the /command switch.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

LSrunasE stores encrypted passwords in batch files. Local users can extract these encrypted passwords and create modified batch files using the /password switch with the stolen password combined with the /command switch to specify an arbitrary program, achieving local privilege escalation.

MitigationAvoid storing credentials in batch files; implement proper credential storage mechanisms, restrict access to configuration files containing credentials, and consider using Windows built-in privilege escalation methods instead of third-party tools.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LsrunaseApplication
Affected:= 1.0
SupercryptApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if LSrunasE or Supercrypt is installed
    Search for Moernaut LSrunasE or Supercrypt executables on the system. Common locations may include C:\Program Files\ or directories where third-party utilities are stored. Look for lsrunase.exe or supercrypt.exe.
    Affected if Either Moernaut Lsrunase version 1.0 or Moernaut Supercrypt version 1.0 is installed on the system.
  2. Locate batch files containing encrypted passwords
    Search for .bat or .cmd files that may have been created using LSrunasE. These files typically contain encrypted password strings. Look in user home directories, scheduled task folders, or application data directories.
    Affected if Batch files with encrypted password strings created by LSrunasE exist on the system.
  3. Inspect batch files for /password switch usage
    Examine any found batch files for the presence of the /password switch followed by encrypted password strings. Open the files in a text editor to view their contents.
    Affected if Batch files contain the /password switch with encrypted credential data.
  4. Identify batch files with /command switch
    Search for batch files containing the /command switch which specifies the program to run. These would be the files an attacker could modify to execute arbitrary programs.
    Affected if Batch files using the /command switch to specify programs are present alongside /password switches.
  5. Verify access controls on configuration and batch files
    Check file permissions on any LSrunasE-related configuration or batch files. Determine if standard users can read or modify these files.
    Affected if Non-privileged users can read encrypted passwords from batch files or modify batch files to inject arbitrary commands.

The environment is affected if Moernaut LSrunasE 1.0 or Supercrypt 1.0 is installed and batch files containing encrypted passwords with /password and /command switches are accessible to local users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Avoid storing credentials in batch files; implement proper credential storage mechanisms, restrict access to configuration files containing credentials, and consider using Windows built-in privilege escalation methods instead of third-party tools.

Fix this in Lsrunase Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0581 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data