CVE-2008-0727
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple buffer overflows in oninit.exe in IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS) 7.x through 11.x allow (1) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long password and (2) remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long DBPATH value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerabilities in IBM Informix Dynamic Server's oninit.exe allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by providing overly long password strings (no authentication required), and authenticated users can achieve code execution via excessively long DBPATH values.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.3= 7.31.xd8= 7.31.xd9= 9.3= 9.4= 9.40.tc5= 9.40.uc1= 9.40.uc2= 9.40.uc3= 9.40.uc5= 9.40.xd8= 9.40_xc7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM Informix Dynamic Server installationLocate the oninit.exe binary on the system. Typical paths include $INFORMIXDIR/bin/oninit.exe on Windows or $INFORMIXDIR/bin/oninit on Unix. Check for the presence of Informix-specific directories and the oninit executable.Affected if The oninit.exe binary exists on the system and matches one of the affected version ranges.
-
Identify installed Informix versionRun 'oninit -version' or 'oninit -V' from the Informix bin directory, or query the system registry on Windows for the Informix version key. Alternatively, examine the oninit.exe file properties for version information.Affected if The installed version matches any of: 7.3, 7.31.xd8, 7.31.xd9, 9.3, 9.4, 9.40.tc5, 9.40.uc1, 9.40.uc2, 9.40.uc3, 9.40.uc5, 9.40.xd8, or 9.40_xc7.
-
Check if Informix listener is network accessibleIdentify ports used by Informix (typically 9088 for web enabled, 1526 for connection, or 1524 for olsoctcp) using 'netstat -an' or by examining the sqlhosts file. Determine if these ports are bound to external IP addresses rather than localhost only.Affected if The Informix service is listening on a publicly accessible IP address, enabling remote attackers to send long password strings without authentication.
-
Verify remote authentication is enabledCheck the sqlhosts file and Informix configuration (onconfig) for network listener settings. Confirm that the ONCONFIG parameter allows remote connections. Look for 'olsoctcp' or 'onsoctcp' entries in sqlhosts that permit TCP/IP connections from non-localhost sources.Affected if Remote TCP/IP connections are enabled, allowing the unauthenticated password overflow vector to be exploited.
A system is affected if IBM Informix Dynamic Server is installed with a version matching any of the listed affected versions and the oninit service is network-accessible, enabling remote attackers to send oversized password strings without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM Informix patches or upgrade to a non-vulnerable version; implement input length validation on the password and DBPATH parameters as a compensating control if immediate patching is not feasible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0727 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0727 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data