CVE-2008-0882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDouble free vulnerability in the process_browse_data function in CUPS 1.3.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted UDP Browse packets to the cupsd port (631/udp), related to an unspecified manipulation of a remote printer. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA double-free vulnerability exists in the process_browse_data function of CUPS 1.3.5, where crafted UDP Browse packets sent to port 631/UDP can trigger a double-free condition. This allows remote attackers to crash the cupsd daemon and potentially execute arbitrary code through unspecified manipulation of a remote printer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CUPS versionRun 'cups-config --version' or check the package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l cups', 'rpm -q cups', or 'yum list installed cups') to determine the installed CUPS versionAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.3.5
-
Verify cupsd daemon is runningRun 'ps aux | grep cupsd' or 'systemctl status cups' (or 'service cups status' on older systems) to check if the CUPS daemon is activeAffected if cupsd is running and the CUPS version is 1.3.5
-
Confirm UDP port 631 is listeningRun 'netstat -uan | grep 631' or 'ss -uan | grep 631' to check if the CUPS UDP Browse port is openAffected if Port 631/UDP is open and CUPS version is 1.3.5
-
Check if CUPS browser browsing is enabledInspect the CUPS configuration file /etc/cups/cupsd.conf for 'BrowseProtocols', 'BrowseAddress', or 'Browsing On' directives. Alternatively, run 'lpoptions -p <printer> -l' to list printer options. The browse daemon listens for UDP packets when browsing is enabled.Affected if CUPS browser browsing functionality is enabled (Browsing On in cupsd.conf) and the version is 1.3.5
A system is affected if it runs CUPS version 1.3.5 with the cupsd daemon active, UDP port 631 open, and CUPS browser browsing functionality enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade CUPS to a patched version beyond 1.3.5. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider blocking UDP port 631 at network boundaries or disabling CUPS browser browsing functionality to reduce attack surface.
CUPS 1.3.6 or later (or latest stable version available from your distribution vendor)
- 1. Identify the CUPS package manager for your system (apt, yum, zypper, etc.)
- 2. Back up your current CUPS configuration (/etc/cups/ directory)
- 3. Update the package repository metadata
- 4. Upgrade the cups package to version 1.3.6 or later, or to the latest stable version available for your distribution
- 5. Restart the CUPS daemon: service cups restart or systemctl restart cups
- 6. Verify the CUPS version running: cupsd --version
- 7. Test that printing functionality works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-0882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- docs.info.apple.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.cups.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-0882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data