CVE-2008-1217
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in nlnotes.dll in the client in IBM Lotus Notes 6.5, 7.0.x before 7.0.2 CCH, and 8.0.x before 8.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted attachment in an e-mail message sent over SMTP, a variant of CVE-2007-6706.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRemote code execution vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes client (nlnotes.dll) allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted attachments in SMTP email messages. The flaw exists in attachment handling and is a variant of CVE-2007-6706.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.5= 7.0.2= 8.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Lotus Notes versionOpen Lotus Notes, go to Help > About IBM Lotus Notes, or check the version in the client login screen. Alternatively, check the Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lotus\Notes or the installation directory for version.infoAffected if The displayed version is exactly 6.5, 7.0.2, or 8.0.0
-
Verify client handles email attachmentsConfirm that the Lotus Notes client is configured to receive and open email attachments. This is typically enabled by default in standard client configurations. Check File > Preferences > Mail > General for attachment handling settingsAffected if The client is configured to automatically handle attachments in received emails (default configuration)
-
Confirm SMTP email receptionVerify the client is configured to receive email via SMTP. Check File > Preferences > Mail > Internet Mail or examine the client location document for mail server settingsAffected if The client receives email via SMTP protocol, which is the standard configuration for most installations
You are affected if your IBM Lotus Notes client version is exactly 6.5, 7.0.2, or 8.0.0 AND you handle email attachments in received SMTP messages (standard configuration).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate IBM Lotus Notes client to version 7.0.2 CCH or 8.0.1 or later to patch the vulnerability. Consider implementing email attachment filtering at the gateway as an additional defense layer.
Lotus Notes 7.0.2 CCH or later; Lotus Notes 8.0.1 or later (6.5 is end-of-life, migrate to 7.0.2+ or 8.0.1+)
- Identify the currently installed IBM Lotus Notes version and build number
- For Lotus Notes 7.0.x: Upgrade to version 7.0.2 CCH (Critical Patch Cluster) or later
- For Lotus Notes 8.0.x: Upgrade to version 8.0.1 or later
- For Lotus Notes 6.5: Upgrade to a supported version (7.0.2+ or 8.0.1+) as 6.5 is end-of-life
- Apply the upgrade via IBM Fix Central or your internal software distribution system
- Verify the nlnotes.dll version matches the patched release after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-1217 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-1217 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data